From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
tj@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
Cc: leo.duran@amd.com, graeme.gregory@linaro.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 22:56:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54943CB5.2030206@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418858195-22857-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Hi Suravee,
On 2014年12月18日 07:16, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>
> Device drivers typically use ACPI _HIDs/_CIDs listed in struct device_driver
> acpi_match_table to match devices. However, for generic drivers, we do
> not want to list _HID for all supported devices, and some device classes
> do not have _CID (e.g. SATA, USB). Instead, we can leverage ACPI _CLS,
> which specifies PCI-defined class code (i.e. base-class, subclass and
> programming interface).
>
> This patch adds support for matching ACPI devices using the _CLS method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/acnames.h | 1 +
> include/linux/acpi.h | 12 ++++++-
> include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 6 ++++
> 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index d670158..6406648 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -864,6 +864,79 @@ int acpi_match_device_ids(struct acpi_device *device,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_match_device_ids);
>
> +/**
> + * acpi_match_device_cls - Match a struct device against a ACPI _CLS method
> + * @dev_cls: A pointer to struct acpi_device_cls object to match against.
> + * @dev: The ACPI device structure to match.
> + *
> + * Check if @dev has a valid ACPI and _CLS handle. If there is a
> + * struct acpi_device_cls object for that handle, use that object to match
> + * against the given struct acpi_device_cls object.
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success or error code on failure.
> + */
> +int acpi_match_device_cls(const struct acpi_device_cls *dev_cls,
> + const struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + acpi_status status;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + union acpi_object *pkg;
> + struct acpi_device_cls cls;
> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> + struct acpi_buffer format = { sizeof("NNN"), "NNN" };
> + struct acpi_buffer state = { 0, NULL };
> + acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
...
> + acpi_handle cls_handle;
> +
> + if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
if handle is not NULL, adev will not NULL too :)
because you get the handle from adev, ACPI_HANDLE() is defined as:
acpi_device_handle(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)), and adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
you may use adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev) to simplify the code.
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!adev->status.present || !dev_cls)
> + return ret;
> +
> + status = acpi_get_handle(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CLS, &cls_handle);
do we need this function called here? _CLS is the method under ACPI
device object in DSDT/SSDT, and you will get adev->handle == cls_handle
if I'm not wrong :)
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return ret;
> +
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(cls_handle, "_CLS", NULL, &buffer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Failed to Evaluat _CLS"));
> + return ret;
> + }
I think you can evaluate _CLS directly with handle here.
Thanks
Hanjun
> +
> + /**
> + * Note:
> + * ACPIv5.1 defines the package to contain 3 integers for
> + * Base-Class code, Sub-Class code, and Programming Interface code.
> + */
> + pkg = buffer.pointer;
> + if (!pkg ||
> + (pkg->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) ||
> + (pkg->package.count != 3)) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Invalid _CLS data\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + state.length = sizeof(struct acpi_device_cls);
> + state.pointer = &cls;
> +
> + status = acpi_extract_package(pkg, &format, &state);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Invalid data"));
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if ((dev_cls->base_class == cls.base_class) &&
> + (dev_cls->sub_class == cls.sub_class) &&
> + (dev_cls->prog_interface == cls.prog_interface))
> + ret = 0;
> +out:
> + kfree(buffer.pointer);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_match_device_cls);
> +
> static void acpi_free_power_resources_lists(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> int i;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acnames.h b/include/acpi/acnames.h
> index 7461327..22332a6 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acnames.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acnames.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> #define METHOD_NAME__BBN "_BBN"
> #define METHOD_NAME__CBA "_CBA"
> #define METHOD_NAME__CID "_CID"
> +#define METHOD_NAME__CLS "_CLS"
> #define METHOD_NAME__CRS "_CRS"
> #define METHOD_NAME__DDN "_DDN"
> #define METHOD_NAME__HID "_HID"
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 5a92d49..8680afa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -428,10 +428,14 @@ extern int acpi_nvs_for_each_region(int (*func)(__u64, __u64, void *),
> const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *ids,
> const struct device *dev);
>
> +int acpi_match_device_cls(const struct acpi_device_cls *dev_cls,
> + const struct device *dev);
> +
> static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device *dev,
> const struct device_driver *drv)
> {
> - return !!acpi_match_device(drv->acpi_match_table, dev);
> + return (!!acpi_match_device(drv->acpi_match_table, dev) ||
> + !acpi_match_device_cls(drv->acpi_cls, dev));
> }
>
> int acpi_device_uevent_modalias(struct device *, struct kobj_uevent_env *);
> @@ -511,6 +515,12 @@ static inline const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_device(
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static int acpi_match_device_cls(const struct acpi_device_cls *dev_cls,
> + const struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device *dev,
> const struct device_driver *drv)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index ce1f2160..a469adc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct device_driver {
>
> const struct of_device_id *of_match_table;
> const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_table;
> + const struct acpi_device_cls *acpi_cls;
>
> int (*probe) (struct device *dev);
> int (*remove) (struct device *dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> index 44eeef0..f2ef3c6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ struct css_device_id {
>
> #define ACPI_ID_LEN 9
>
> +struct acpi_device_cls {
> + kernel_ulong_t base_class;
> + kernel_ulong_t sub_class;
> + kernel_ulong_t prog_interface;
> +};
> +
> struct acpi_device_id {
> __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 23:16 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-12-17 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-12-19 14:56 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
[not found] ` <549472C6.9090908@amd.com>
2014-12-19 19:33 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-12-17 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ata: ahci_platform: Add ACPI _CLS matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-12-18 9:02 ` Hans de Goede
2014-12-18 9:17 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-19 18:21 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54943CB5.2030206@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).