linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: at91/pm: move the standby functions to pm.c
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:14:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550FE79C.6050305@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426545886-19162-2-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

Le 16/03/2015 23:44, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> The standby functions are now only used in pm.c, move them there.
> 
> Also, they are not inlined as a pointer to those functions is passed to the
> cpuidle driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h | 92 -------------------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index f93a735ba327..5062699cbb12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,95 @@ static void at91_pm_set_standby(void (*at91_standby)(void))
>  		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91_standby;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The AT91RM9200 goes into self-refresh mode with this command, and will
> + * terminate self-refresh automatically on the next SDRAM access.
> + *
> + * Self-refresh mode is exited as soon as a memory access is made, but we don't
> + * know for sure when that happens. However, we need to restore the low-power
> + * mode if it was enabled before going idle. Restoring low-power mode while
> + * still in self-refresh is "not recommended", but seems to work.
> + */
> +static void at91rm9200_standby(void)
> +{
> +	u32 lpr = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR);
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"b    1f\n\t"
> +		".align    5\n\t"
> +		"1:  mcr    p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n\t"
> +		"    str    %0, [%1, %2]\n\t"
> +		"    str    %3, [%1, %4]\n\t"
> +		"    mcr    p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4\n\t"
> +		"    str    %5, [%1, %2]"
> +		:
> +		: "r" (0), "r" (at91_ramc_base[0]), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR),
> +		  "r" (1), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_SRR),
> +		  "r" (lpr));
> +}
> +
> +/* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
> + * remember.
> + */
> +static void at91_ddr_standby(void)
> +{
> +	/* Those two values allow us to delay self-refresh activation
> +	 * to the maximum. */
> +	u32 lpr0, lpr1 = 0;
> +	u32 saved_lpr0, saved_lpr1 = 0;
> +
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1]) {
> +		saved_lpr1 = at91_ramc_read(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
> +		lpr1 = saved_lpr1 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> +		lpr1 |= AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> +	}
> +
> +	saved_lpr0 = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
> +	lpr0 = saved_lpr0 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> +	lpr0 |= AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> +
> +	/* self-refresh mode now */
> +	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr0);
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> +		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr1);
> +
> +	cpu_do_idle();
> +
> +	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> +		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
> +}
> +
> +/* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
> + * remember.
> + */
> +static void at91sam9_sdram_standby(void)
> +{
> +	u32 lpr0, lpr1 = 0;
> +	u32 saved_lpr0, saved_lpr1 = 0;
> +
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1]) {
> +		saved_lpr1 = at91_ramc_read(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
> +		lpr1 = saved_lpr1 & ~AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB;
> +		lpr1 |= AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> +	}
> +
> +	saved_lpr0 = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
> +	lpr0 = saved_lpr0 & ~AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB;
> +	lpr0 |= AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> +
> +	/* self-refresh mode now */
> +	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, lpr0);
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> +		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, lpr1);
> +
> +	cpu_do_idle();
> +
> +	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
> +	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> +		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id ramc_ids[] __initconst = {
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc", .data = at91rm9200_standby },
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc", .data = at91sam9_sdram_standby },
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> index dcacfa1ad3fa..3223967d3460 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> @@ -23,96 +23,4 @@
>  
>  #define	AT91_PM_SLOW_CLOCK	0x01
>  
> -/*
> - * The AT91RM9200 goes into self-refresh mode with this command, and will
> - * terminate self-refresh automatically on the next SDRAM access.
> - *
> - * Self-refresh mode is exited as soon as a memory access is made, but we don't
> - * know for sure when that happens. However, we need to restore the low-power
> - * mode if it was enabled before going idle. Restoring low-power mode while
> - * still in self-refresh is "not recommended", but seems to work.
> - */
> -
> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -static inline void at91rm9200_standby(void)
> -{
> -	u32 lpr = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR);
> -
> -	asm volatile(
> -		"b    1f\n\t"
> -		".align    5\n\t"
> -		"1:  mcr    p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n\t"
> -		"    str    %0, [%1, %2]\n\t"
> -		"    str    %3, [%1, %4]\n\t"
> -		"    mcr    p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4\n\t"
> -		"    str    %5, [%1, %2]"
> -		:
> -		: "r" (0), "r" (at91_ramc_base[0]), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR),
> -		  "r" (1), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_SRR),
> -		  "r" (lpr));
> -}
> -
> -/* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
> - * remember.
> - */
> -static inline void at91_ddr_standby(void)
> -{
> -	/* Those two values allow us to delay self-refresh activation
> -	 * to the maximum. */
> -	u32 lpr0, lpr1 = 0;
> -	u32 saved_lpr0, saved_lpr1 = 0;
> -
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1]) {
> -		saved_lpr1 = at91_ramc_read(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
> -		lpr1 = saved_lpr1 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> -		lpr1 |= AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> -	}
> -
> -	saved_lpr0 = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
> -	lpr0 = saved_lpr0 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> -	lpr0 |= AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> -
> -	/* self-refresh mode now */
> -	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr0);
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> -		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr1);
> -
> -	cpu_do_idle();
> -
> -	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> -		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
> -}
> -
> -/* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
> - * remember.
> - */
> -static inline void at91sam9_sdram_standby(void)
> -{
> -	u32 lpr0, lpr1 = 0;
> -	u32 saved_lpr0, saved_lpr1 = 0;
> -
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1]) {
> -		saved_lpr1 = at91_ramc_read(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
> -		lpr1 = saved_lpr1 & ~AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB;
> -		lpr1 |= AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> -	}
> -
> -	saved_lpr0 = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
> -	lpr0 = saved_lpr0 & ~AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB;
> -	lpr0 |= AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH;
> -
> -	/* self-refresh mode now */
> -	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, lpr0);
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> -		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, lpr1);
> -
> -	cpu_do_idle();
> -
> -	at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
> -	if (at91_ramc_base[1])
> -		at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
> -}
> -
> -#endif
>  #endif
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-23 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 22:44 [PATCH 00/10] ARM: at91 cleanups for 4.1 #2 Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: at91/pm: move the standby functions to pm.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23 10:14   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] ARM: at91/pm: move AT91_MEMCTRL_* to pm.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23 10:15   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] ata: at91: use syscon to configure the smc Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23 10:11   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-23 16:38     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: at91: drop sam9_smc.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] mfd: syscon: Add Atmel MC (Memory Controller) registers definition Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23  9:57   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-23 14:47     ` Lee Jones
2015-03-23 12:31   ` Lee Jones
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: at91: declare the at91rm9200 memory controller as a syscon Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] pcmcia: at91_cf: Use syscon to configure the MC/smc Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] ARM: at91/pm: use the atmel-mc syscon defines Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: at91: remove mach/at91_ramc.h and mach/at91rm9200_mc.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23 10:01   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-16 22:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200_sdramc.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-23 10:14 ` [PATCH 00/10] ARM: at91 cleanups for 4.1 #2 Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550FE79C.6050305@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).