From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Lambert Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:33:47 +0200 Message-ID: <55268DCB.3010201@gmail.com> References: <1428579988-10167-1-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <1428579988-10167-3-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:38872 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751445AbbDIOew (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:34:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Oh. They're not GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend. The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches really are different. The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second one does. Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ? regards, Quentin