* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0
[not found] ` <20150804144711.GB24716@redhat.com>
@ 2015-08-04 16:10 ` Jeff Moyer
[not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Moyer @ 2015-08-04 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Snitzer
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Andreas Hartmann, linux-pci,
device-mapper development, Jens Axboe, iommu, Leo Duran,
Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz, linux-ide
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400,
> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> > >>https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc
>> > >>
>> > >>block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap
>>
>> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug
>> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the
>> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole
>> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later.
>
> That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block:
> remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org
> cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572
>
> But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific
> hardware? something comparable to this?:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6
>
> We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2
> though.
CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html
Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of
/sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks.
Cheers,
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0
[not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Hartmann @ 2015-08-04 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Moyer, Mike Snitzer
Cc: device-mapper development, linux-pci, Andreas Hartmann,
Jens Axboe, linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA,
Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz
On 08/04/2015 at 06:10 PM Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400,
>> Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap
>>>
>>> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug
>>> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the
>>> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole
>>> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later.
>>
>> That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block:
>> remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org
>> cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572
>>
>> But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific
>> hardware? something comparable to this?:
>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6
>>
>> We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2
>> though.
>
> CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html
>
> Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of
> /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks.
It's always 32767.
Where does this value come from? Is it empirical or is it calculated (on
base of which parameters)?
Devices are:
1 x Corsair Force GT (SSD)
2 x ST3000DM001-1CH166 (rotational) (WD)
How can I set a higher max_sectors_kb on boot before the partitions are
mounted (-> as kernel option)? Mounting the partitions here (w/ systemd)
is the easiest and best way to trigger the problem!
Thanks,
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0
2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
@ 2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Hartmann @ 2015-08-07 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Hartmann, Jeff Moyer, Mike Snitzer
Cc: Joerg Roedel, linux-pci, device-mapper development, Jens Axboe,
iommu, Leo Duran, Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz,
linux-ide
On 08/04/2015 at 08:11 PM, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 at 06:10 PM Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400,
>>> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug
>>>> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the
>>>> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole
>>>> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later.
>>>
>>> That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block:
>>> remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org
>>> cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572
>>>
>>> But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific
>>> hardware? something comparable to this?:
>>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6
>>>
>>> We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2
>>> though.
>>
>> CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting:
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html
>>
>> Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of
>> /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks.
>
>
> It's always 32767.
>
> Where does this value come from? Is it empirical or is it calculated (on
> base of which parameters)?
>
>
> Devices are:
>
> 1 x Corsair Force GT (SSD)
> 2 x ST3000DM001-1CH166 (rotational) (WD)
>
>
> How can I set a higher max_sectors_kb on boot before the partitions are
> mounted (-> as kernel option)? Mounting the partitions here (w/ systemd)
> is the easiest and best way to trigger the problem!
Please - no idea how to set higher max_sectors_kb before mounting of
partitions? Come on! I want to test exactly this situation!
Regards,
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-07 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <55B7BEA2.30205@01019freenet.de>
[not found] ` <20150728175054.GB24782@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55B7D054.4070308@maya.org>
[not found] ` <20150728192908.GA25264@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55BCD5A7.2080708@maya.org>
[not found] ` <55BE1D5E.6020709@maya.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.02.1508021347480.17729@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55BE65E6.7060901@maya.org>
[not found] ` <20150803081249.GF14980@8bytes.org>
[not found] ` <20150804144711.GB24716@redhat.com>
2015-08-04 16:10 ` AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0 Jeff Moyer
[not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).