* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0 [not found] ` <20150804144711.GB24716@redhat.com> @ 2015-08-04 16:10 ` Jeff Moyer [not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jeff Moyer @ 2015-08-04 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Joerg Roedel, Andreas Hartmann, linux-pci, device-mapper development, Jens Axboe, iommu, Leo Duran, Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz, linux-ide Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400, > Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> > >>https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc >> > >> >> > >>block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap >> >> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug >> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the >> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole >> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later. > > That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block: > remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org > cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572 > > But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific > hardware? something comparable to this?: > http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6 > > We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2 > though. CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks. Cheers, Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0 [not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann 2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andreas Hartmann @ 2015-08-04 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Moyer, Mike Snitzer Cc: device-mapper development, linux-pci, Andreas Hartmann, Jens Axboe, linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA, Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz On 08/04/2015 at 06:10 PM Jeff Moyer wrote: > Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> writes: > >> On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400, >> Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc >>>>>> >>>>>> block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap >>> >>> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug >>> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the >>> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole >>> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later. >> >> That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block: >> remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org >> cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572 >> >> But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific >> hardware? something comparable to this?: >> http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6 >> >> We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2 >> though. > > CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html > > Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of > /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks. It's always 32767. Where does this value come from? Is it empirical or is it calculated (on base of which parameters)? Devices are: 1 x Corsair Force GT (SSD) 2 x ST3000DM001-1CH166 (rotational) (WD) How can I set a higher max_sectors_kb on boot before the partitions are mounted (-> as kernel option)? Mounting the partitions here (w/ systemd) is the easiest and best way to trigger the problem! Thanks, Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0 2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann @ 2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andreas Hartmann @ 2015-08-07 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Hartmann, Jeff Moyer, Mike Snitzer Cc: Joerg Roedel, linux-pci, device-mapper development, Jens Axboe, iommu, Leo Duran, Mikulas Patocka, Christoph Hellwig, Milan Broz, linux-ide On 08/04/2015 at 08:11 PM, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > On 08/04/2015 at 06:10 PM Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 03 2015 at 4:12am -0400, >>> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 08:48:06PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34b48db66e08ca1c1bc07cf305d672ac940268dc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> block: remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap >>>> >>>> Looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just uncovered a bug >>>> elsewhere. It looks like an underlying driver doesn't expect the >>>> big io-requests that the patch enables and does not dma-map the whole >>>> target buffer, causing the IO_PAGE_FAULTs later. >>> >>> That patch has caused issues elsewhere too, see this 'Revert "block: >>> remove artifical max_hw_sectors cap"' thread (if/when lkml.org >>> cooperates): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/20/572 >>> >>> But it could be that there is a need for a horkage fix for this specific >>> hardware? something comparable to this?: >>> http://git.kernel.org/linus/af34d637637eabaf49406eb35c948cd51ba262a6 >>> >>> We are running out of time to fix these whack-a-mole issues in 4.2 >>> though. >> >> CC-ing linux-ide. Original dm-devel posting: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-July/msg00178.html >> >> Andreas, I would be curious to know what the value of >> /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb is for the affected disks. > > > It's always 32767. > > Where does this value come from? Is it empirical or is it calculated (on > base of which parameters)? > > > Devices are: > > 1 x Corsair Force GT (SSD) > 2 x ST3000DM001-1CH166 (rotational) (WD) > > > How can I set a higher max_sectors_kb on boot before the partitions are > mounted (-> as kernel option)? Mounting the partitions here (w/ systemd) > is the easiest and best way to trigger the problem! Please - no idea how to set higher max_sectors_kb before mounting of partitions? Come on! I want to test exactly this situation! Regards, Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-07 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <55B7BEA2.30205@01019freenet.de>
[not found] ` <20150728175054.GB24782@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55B7D054.4070308@maya.org>
[not found] ` <20150728192908.GA25264@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55BCD5A7.2080708@maya.org>
[not found] ` <55BE1D5E.6020709@maya.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.02.1508021347480.17729@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55BE65E6.7060901@maya.org>
[not found] ` <20150803081249.GF14980@8bytes.org>
[not found] ` <20150804144711.GB24716@redhat.com>
2015-08-04 16:10 ` AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs and ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED errors since Linux 4.0 Jeff Moyer
[not found] ` <x4937zzm3uc.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-04 18:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2015-08-07 6:04 ` Andreas Hartmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).