From: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
To: Kevin Groeneveld <KGroeneveld@lenbrook.com>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: fix race between simultaneous decrements of ->host_failed
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:37:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574F9BE4.4020405@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF6B9AADDDF11740967545E971C7C0DE6B861A22@MAIL1.pickering.lenbrook.com>
Hi, Kevin,
On 2016/6/1 22:36, Kevin Groeneveld wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: fix race between simultaneous decrements of ->host_failed
>
> I wonder if this could be related to http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg86808.html?
>
> I never did get to the bottom of that. If I have time I hope to retest my scsi hang issue with this patch.
>
The concurrently decrements of host_failed only lead to abnormal
of host_failed, host_busy will be zero after error handler, and
the result may be host_failed > host_busy forever. But in your
case, host_busy > host_failed, so I think it's not the same
case. I'm afraid that this patch can't fix your scsi hang issue.
Thanks,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 8:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: fix race between simultaneous decrements of ->host_failed Wei Fang
2016-05-31 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation/scsi: update scsi_eh.txt about ->host_failed Wei Fang
2016-05-31 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: fix race between simultaneous decrements of ->host_failed Tejun Heo
2016-06-01 1:20 ` Wei Fang
2016-06-01 3:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-06-01 3:30 ` Dan Williams
2016-06-01 14:06 ` James Bottomley
2016-06-02 1:58 ` Wei Fang
2016-06-01 14:36 ` Kevin Groeneveld
2016-06-01 15:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-01 15:38 ` James Bottomley
2016-06-02 2:37 ` Wei Fang [this message]
2016-06-02 3:09 ` Wei Fang
2016-06-06 12:48 ` Kevin Groeneveld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574F9BE4.4020405@huawei.com \
--to=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=KGroeneveld@lenbrook.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox