From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:51:14 +0200 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <58cb370e04102706512283405@mail.gmail.com> References: <58cb370e04102706074c20d6d7@mail.gmail.com> <20041027133431.GF1127@zip.com.au> Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:18952 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262443AbUJ0NvQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:51:16 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so309319wri for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:51:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20041027133431.GF1127@zip.com.au> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: CaT Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2494 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:34:31 +1000, CaT wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:07:14PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > (04/10/26 1.2192) > > [ide] pdc202xx_old: PDC20267 needs the same LBA48 fixup as PDC20265 > > What would the symptoms of this bug be? I've got a PDC20267 and I'm > having a few issues transferring from hde to hdh (ie across two ports) > it seems. My work at duplicating things seems to work best when I do a > transfer like that rather then going from say, a totall different > controller to the pdc (hdh) or even from generated input to the pdc (hdh). > > -- > Red herrings strewn hither and yon.