Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:33:26 +0200, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz writes:
> 
> 
>  > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2494
>  >
>  > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:34:31 +1000, CaT <cat@zip.com.au> wrote:
>  > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:07:14PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>  > > > <bzolnier@trik.(none)> (04/10/26 1.2192)
>  > > >    [ide] pdc202xx_old: PDC20267 needs the same LBA48 fixup as PDC20265
>  > >
>  > > What would the symptoms of this bug be? I've got a PDC20267 and I'm
>  > > having a few issues transferring from hde to hdh (ie across two ports)
>  > > it seems. My work at duplicating things seems to work best when I do a
>  > > transfer like that rather then going from say, a totall different
>  > > controller to the pdc (hdh) or even from generated input to the pdc (hdh).
> 
> I see only one note where someone claims the '67 is affected.
> What would trigger it? A large disk or just heavy I/O?
> FWIW, my news server has received, stored, manipulated, and sent >500
> gigabytes of data using a lowly 20267 add-on card in a 440BX mobo,
> and has _never_ had any problems, and I/O is sometimes very heavy.

request with number of sectors > 256 on LBA48 capable disk
(!= large disk)