From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2 25/29] ide: convert REQ_DRIVE_CMD to REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: <58cb370e0502031740141468d4@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050202024017.GA621@htj.dyndns.org> <20050202031559.GP1187@htj.dyndns.org> <58cb370e05020309464a106816@mail.gmail.com> <4202CA95.6030801@home-tj.org> Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207]:21706 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262558AbVBDBkn (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:40:43 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so395158wri for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:40:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4202CA95.6030801@home-tj.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:06:29 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:15:59 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > >>>25_ide_taskfile_cmd.patch > >>> > >>> All in-kernel REQ_DRIVE_CMD users except for ide_cmd_ioctl() > >>> converted to use REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > >> > >>Index: linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c > >>=================================================================== > >>--- linux-ide-export.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:06.527986413 +0900 > >>+++ linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:07.204876587 +0900 > >>@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static int set_multcount(ide_drive_t *dr > >> if (drive->special.b.set_multmode) > >> return -EBUSY; > >> ide_init_drive_cmd (&rq); > >>- rq.flags = REQ_DRIVE_CMD; > >>+ rq.flags = REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE; > > > > > > Please instead fix ide_init_drive_cmd() to set REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE > > and add set REQ_DRIVE_CMD only in ide_cmd_ioctl(). > > > > This is done in patch #28. If you don't like the ordering of the > patches, I can change the orders but I don't think that improves > anything. This order is as good as the other order. Actually no - if you change this then patch #28 becomes NOP. So please do it, thanks.