From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: Sata_promise.c queries Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:26:03 +0100 Message-ID: <58cb370e05020913264177867e@mail.gmail.com> References: <8142CBF3-7AB2-11D9-A80A-000A95D2AC6A@iomega.com> Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199]:1681 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261933AbVBIV0E (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:26:04 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so1370707wri for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:26:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8142CBF3-7AB2-11D9-A80A-000A95D2AC6A@iomega.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Gary Poppitz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:51:47 -0700, Gary Poppitz wrote: > First off, I have the libdata-2.6 pull. > > The version of sata_promise.c is 1.58 . > > Is this the latest one available? > > Next question, in function pdc_qc_issue_prot, there is a BUG() call in > the case of > ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA. It seems like ATAPI support is not implemented in sata_promise.c yet. > Is this one of those "fixme"s that will be addressed Real Soon Now, or > is this an actual error that I am hitting. Naturally, the device I am > using wants to do ATAPI DMA. It is rather one of these "fix it yourself". ;) Bartlomiej