From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH libata-dev-2.6] Issue INITIALIZE DEVICE PARAMETERS for CHS only devices Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:50:00 +0100 Message-ID: <58cb370e050223085039cb0731@mail.gmail.com> References: <006d01c50c11$81003920$a801a8c0@tw.ibm.com> <42167CDD.50301@pobox.com> <421C6840.7090903@tw.ibm.com> Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.206]:28834 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261500AbVBWQuD (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:50:03 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1613522wra for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:50:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <421C6840.7090903@tw.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Albert Lee Cc: Jeff Garzik , Doug Maxey , IDE Linux , Mark Lord Hi, [ generic comment about PATA support in libata, yes wrong thread 8) ] I think that at one point libata and IDE drivers should be merged. Yes, this is doable and I plan to prove it soon (this shouldn't be so hard nowadays :-). I really don't want to have two PATA drivers in the tree with subtle differences (i.e. CHS handling) when one would work in some cases (i.e. 4 Promise controllers) and the second one in other cases (i.e. ATAPI support). I'm sure you get the point. Cheers, Bartlomiej