From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [git patches] IDE update Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:41:34 +0200 Message-ID: <58cb370e05070408417dc3c067@mail.gmail.com> References: <58cb370e05070405302d47fdfd@mail.gmail.com> <200507041530.SAA02324@raad.intranet> Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.200]:20982 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261228AbVGDPlh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:41:37 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o25so172199nfa for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:41:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200507041530.SAA02324@raad.intranet> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Al Boldi Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/4/05, Al Boldi wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: { > What is the "int/dma problem"? > } > > Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31 > Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle > > Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12 > Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT > > It feels like DMA is not being applied properly in 2.6.12. > > Your comments please. Are earlier 2.6.x kernels okay? dmesg output? Bartlomiej