From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: libata total system lockup fix Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:32:37 +0200 Message-ID: <58cb370e050819063253265500@mail.gmail.com> References: <42E4ED70.1050501@pobox.com> <42E4FC75.70006@pobox.com> <42E50AE9.3000207@rtr.ca> <42F2E267.50402@gmail.com> <42FA70A9.6080608@pobox.com> <43052C03.7060306@pobox.com> <1124444101.2217.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4305D9A6.8010502@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.204]:60220 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932677AbVHSNck convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:32:40 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so177069nfc for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:32:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4305D9A6.8010502@rtr.ca> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Erik Slagter , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , IDE/ATA development list On 8/19/05, Mark Lord wrote: > Erik Slagter wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:46 -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > > > >>After a week of further experience with this patch, > .. > >>I'm now reverting to the original "broken" patch > .. > > > > What is exactly the "broken" patch and what is "this" patch? > > "this" patch refered to the subject of that email, > the "one-liner" included therein. > > The "broken" patch (which behaves in a very unbroken manner) > is in the collection of "essentials" that I maintain for > modern laptop users at http://rtr.ca/dell_i9300/kernels/ http://rtr.ca/dell_i9300/kernel/