Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: (For review) Teach libata to tune master/slave seperately
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:40:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e0601180340v529c04fdq5dc962285a6fc1c0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137531678.14135.105.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi,

Patch looks fine some comments below:

On 1/17/06, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> This also adds a filter hook which allows drives to veto modes by drive
> specific detail. This is preferable to the more obvious 'have the driver
> change the speed itself' approach because we have a combination of
> constraints some known by the driver and some (such as PHY limits) by
> the core code. We don't want drivers overriding constraints due to lack
> of knowledge and setting unsafe/invalid modes.

Yep.

> The core logic is unchanged, it's merely had a re-order and the mode

The core logic is changed (in the positive way): ata_pio_modes()
is finally used for obtaining PIO mask to be used.

Please update the patch description or make it a separate change.

The other functional change is the ordering of programming host/devices:

previously:
* program PIO for device 0 [host]
* program PIO for device 1 [host]
* program DMA for device 0 [host]
* program DMA for device 1 [host]
* program xfer mode for device 0 [device]
* program xfer mode for device 1 [device]

now:
* program PIO for device 0 [host]
* program DMA for device 0 [host]
* program xfer mode for device 0 [device]
* program PIO for device 1 [host]
* program DMA for device 1 [host]
* program xfer mode for device 0 [device]

This change is OK but I wonder what is the reason for it?

> decision is made twice instead of once only. Another important change in
> the re-order which makes driver writers life much easier for PATA is
> that both drive speeds decisions are made *before* the driver is called.
>
> This is essential to your sanity when programming the many controllers
> that do not use the device select bit to switch between address setup
> times.
>
> Tested in my patches for a while and seems to work for the combinations
> I have. Introduces no new bugs I've found but obviously piix secondary
> slave doesn't reliably work with or without this change because of the
> current piix driver bug.

I thought it was merged already (it is obviously correct)?

Thanks,
Bartlomiej

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-18 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17 21:01 PATCH: (For review) Teach libata to tune master/slave seperately Alan Cox
2006-01-18 11:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2006-01-18 12:04   ` Alan Cox
2006-01-18 12:44     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58cb370e0601180340v529c04fdq5dc962285a6fc1c0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox