From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
TJ Adams <tadamsjr@google.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:06:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66ad274d-9890-411d-9fba-90fed2eb33f5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWxVbT=f+kZ58urwGhYD9RfBnu7u8oLAyrx_riU8OGt0w@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/26/24 18:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:55 PM Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com> wrote:
>> Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
>> because the ata_port location is different for libsas.
>>
>> Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
>> - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_enable
>> - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_supported
>>
>> The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
>> helper functions.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit b4d3ddd2df7531e3 ("scsi:
> libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices")
> in scsi-mkp/for-next
>
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
>
>> +
>> +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_supported, S_IRUGO, sas_ncq_prio_supported_show, NULL);
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>> + sas_ncq_prio_enable_show, sas_ncq_prio_enable_store);
>> +
>
> When both CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA and CONFIG_SATA_HOST are enabled:
I have both enabled in my config and I do not see any issue. What is special
with these on ARM ?
>
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/ata/libata-sata.o:(.data+0x110):
> multiple definition of `dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported';
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.o:(.data+0x260): first defined here
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/ata/libata-sata.o:(.data+0xd8): multiple
> definition of `dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable';
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.o:(.data+0x228): first defined here
>
> Making both new DEVICE_ATTR() declarations static doesn't work,
> as <linux/libata.h> contains a forward declaration for the existing global
> dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported in libata:
>
> In file included from include/linux/async.h:14,
> from drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:12:
> include/linux/device.h:156:33: error: static declaration of
> ‘dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported’ follows non-static declaration
> 156 | struct device_attribute dev_attr_##_name =
> __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store)
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:984:8: note: in expansion of macro ‘DEVICE_ATTR’
> 984 | static DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_supported, S_IRUGO,
> sas_ncq_prio_supported_show,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/scsi/sas_ata.h:13,
> from drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:15:
> include/linux/libata.h:508:32: note: previous declaration of
> ‘dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported’ with type ‘struct device_attribute’
> 508 | extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/linux/async.h:14,
> from drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:12:
> include/linux/device.h:156:33: error: static declaration of
> ‘dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable’ follows non-static declaration
> 156 | struct device_attribute dev_attr_##_name =
> __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store)
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:1023:8: note: in expansion of macro ‘DEVICE_ATTR’
> 1023 | static DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/scsi/sas_ata.h:13,
> from drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:15:
> include/linux/libata.h:509:32: note: previous declaration of
> ‘dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable’ with type ‘struct device_attribute’
> 509 | extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Perhaps the new attributes can be renamed?
> Alternatively, the DEVICE_ATTR() can be open-coded, so the actual
> device_attribute structures are named differently.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-07 21:44 [PATCH v8 0/7] NCQ Priority sysfs sttributes for libsas Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] ata: libata-sata: Factor out NCQ Priority configuration helpers Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-08 10:03 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-12 6:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-12 15:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-12 15:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-08 10:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-03-26 10:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-26 10:06 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-03-26 10:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-03-26 11:52 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] scsi: pm80xx: Add libsas SATA sysfs attributes group Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] scsi: mvsas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-08 10:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] scsi: hisi_sas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-08 10:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] scsi: aic94xx: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-08 10:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] scsi: isci: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] NCQ Priority sysfs sttributes for libsas Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66ad274d-9890-411d-9fba-90fed2eb33f5@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=ipylypiv@google.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tadamsjr@google.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).