From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:13:26 -0700 Message-ID: <7vipn2i5xl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20111026202235.GA20928@havoc.gtf.org> <1319969101.5215.20.camel@dabdike> <1320049150.8283.19.camel@dabdike> <7vy5w1ow90.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwrbjlj5r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk47jld5s.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:04:30 -0700") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > And "add a fake empty commit just for the signature" is not the answer > either - because that is clearly inferior to the tags we already had. > > I dunno. Did I miss something? As far as I can tell, the signed tags > that we've had since day one are *clearly* much better in very > fundamental ways. Ok, back to the drawing board (which is not a loss as I wasn't expecting this to be in the official release in upcoming 1.7.8 anyway).