From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2E5C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 22:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232134AbiDFWaa (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:30:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229939AbiDFWa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:30:29 -0400 Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com (esa4.hgst.iphmx.com [216.71.154.42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C9A21D070 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1649284111; x=1680820111; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yg83I+kC50RMwR1HRe5Jn4Gkhm6UoCyb88aTHqcfQX4=; b=M3FfLAaJCx87mjF3hkxZ2fjmqord/PKP4/wQKe8qSk9Y89BCcYsA/Nbe 5M6H/mr/B5GsPa+9CqEevmfLSRnIvXGLGpjlMAsw6jU/BPclRLbeKPWXU 8XwGTObbTsIBQxS0sBeuZRa0yCDdiHUIpmYbUNvHOuhebwJUAVDYytr79 4TgwUaz6olGC3QD3dCUJFOPVyC3NSabXlJXXxqIUJy+cQitYX9TbGAm4P 6AqdN/RNm39kX5BvgKz11vwEAt4WlMQ+By9vAKCnML1RMNMiiPB3/3qAr /SDKZgFJhSBAV/QqAQ88hycklWY/dC6AuGQKegf3vZPDp1rePd9HTvm/k w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,240,1643644800"; d="scan'208";a="196154441" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2022 06:28:30 +0800 IronPort-SDR: cqqXNOu9oCZeubIx8LiitOK+bjXr/c3M3Y+w/GNhgsaxS/uTvqajTaVG31vpRsoY4n9fFk+u0y rXh1Ej3hoL94QCUgrckYWOTuxGac5gyXLCnshC33kaAL1xMsSXGVtm9vI+8uXXZ4PAtjju9ggu iVH3tyUIhQOPG/542XulDqrHAvBRa1BGbJ0BLL5AMsTBUGfer4gt28WnGbF6QXDvQrQgqyfQBD c2a6JFluDqrL2wdna+HVzLc6vWApxkQaQgpdiBADHjSADWCnpXqfcn/rtKYxFTZks7XILzD5LL m1YzOH/LFdhXQbc0yp8R4Ddl Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 06 Apr 2022 14:59:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: fQq4ST8J3a1exP5FKJcSVkUUaPPDAKNt/5Hux51H+8FxIssUFLZTAfBOqbF6ep28pnroX7Ag73 737aecsHlyIh5ot9pJgKCS1FiV+dQw+vn7lkqa6hXZPgeeXKzVKy8NoHVFPoTJCltdDrj47u7p NkCfnScxb8mosT1qij5BXB1EcDnuGepH2TwHVL6LM3WVKXUjLRxcY1z4QPRYDnSFPsmtkYyuDx 2so3O9kg0zq0nn8kVTeiqj/ktiuArnq2i4JnTwh9kxDEzSDq+86t5Zi3531ao/IRTra6o+bjZH pbg= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([10.3.10.180]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 06 Apr 2022 15:28:31 -0700 Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KYfL648LDz1SHwl for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Authentication-Results: usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=opensource.wdc.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= opensource.wdc.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1649284110; x=1651876111; bh=Yg83I+kC50RMwR1HRe5Jn4Gkhm6UoCyb88a THqcfQX4=; b=oWUbqePfU5rE68CCMr4kKzIzl4+YlyOZ4kJexsSm+d/yBECGtbx ixe84XRmjeI8ggZ2ZFlCOVKJAQLubPELnfJC6cPDRfWFNfDDm8Y1rww2Xz9IME+y Pix8rSLs7yvmPF3hq0o2Chs5GvA+T7GfzlEnChe4sG9mLR7uOd3FfoOMQ555zv+G QE8wmsS9CkJvtx2blYZaKY2quJ6ArSJ2u8z4DRNaMQOWXeLkzDyhXmC0zXkV6N3I JA2WPUdGwFPaT3UkSE0buvgZEKAzxHskUhzy7shzlI4m5qQrzAi8pLY8Zu8bAV5v p/7ivHVBTki9ptKaNEnOVsunkwFN+VfNPIg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZQzgdPm8Kd26 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.225.163.4] (css-nuc-sbp2.ad.shared [10.225.163.4]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KYfL52w07z1Rvlx; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <835cf881-56ce-93b7-3182-ae35eda2691d@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 07:28:27 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY configuration item back Content-Language: en-US To: "Limonciello, Mario" Cc: "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" , open list , "hdegoede@redhat.com" , Christoph Hellwig References: <20220404200202.9388-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <20220404200202.9388-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 4/7/22 01:59, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > [Public] > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Damien Le Moal >> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 21:11 >> To: Limonciello, Mario >> Cc: open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers) > ide@vger.kernel.org>; open list ; >> hdegoede@redhat.com; Christoph Hellwig >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY >> configuration item back >> >> On 4/5/22 05:02, Mario Limonciello wrote: >>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY was renamed to >> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY in >>> commit 4dd4d3deb502 ("ata: ahci: Rename >> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY >>> configuration item"). >>> >>> This caused some pain as users would invisibly lose configuration policy >>> defaults when they built the new kernel. To help alleviate that, switch >>> back to the old name (even if it's wrong). >>> >>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig >>> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal >>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello >> >> I applied this manually as the "default 3" is from the first patch, >> which is for 5.19. This one is queued in for-5.18-fixes now. Thanks. > > Ah I didn't realize you were not going to put default 3 in 5.18, otherwise I would > have re-ordered them. Sorry. > > Which branch did you push what you've applied so far to? > I checked libata/for-next and libata/for-5.19 and didn't see anything yet. I pushed the patch to for-5.18-fixes and will send a PR to Linus tomorrow. The for-5.19 and for-next branches always are in sync and currently based on 5.18-rc1. I will rebase them on rc2 next week to have the name revert in and avoid conflicts. > > As most of my patches recently touch the same code want to me make sure > any more follow ups work from the right base. Use 5.19 + the name revert patch for your work. That will correspond to for-5.19 next week. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research