From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI... Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:22:13 +0200 Message-ID: <874owr8ztm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <20090412091228.GA29937@elte.hu> <20090412162018.6c1507b4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <49E213AE.4060506@redhat.com> <49E2DC96.6090407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:49883 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751327AbZDNHWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:22:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:10:40 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Avi Kivity , Alan Cox , Szabolcs Szakacsits , Grant Grundler , Linux IDE mailing list , LKML , Jens Axboe , Arjan van de Ven Linus Torvalds writes: > > You absolutely do _not_ want to manage memory in 16kB chunks (or 64kB for > your example!). AFAIK at least for user visible anonymous memory Windows uses 64k chunks. At least that is what Cygwin's mmap exposes. I don't know if it does the same for disk cache. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.