From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Elias Oltmanns Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: Implement disk shock protection support Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:33:39 +0200 Message-ID: <8763pc29u4.fsf@denkblock.local> References: <87wshzplvk.fsf@denkblock.local> <20080829211345.4355.93873.stgit@denkblock.local> <200809012129.14979.bzolnier@gmail.com> <87ljy90zin.fsf@denkblock.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from nebensachen.de ([195.34.83.29]:46138 "EHLO mail.nebensachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751769AbYICVfB (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:35:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ljy90zin.fsf@denkblock.local> (Elias Oltmanns's message of "Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:01:52 +0200") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , Randy Dunlap , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Elias Oltmanns wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [...] >> Also could you please move the new code to a separate file (i.e. >> ide-park.c) instead of stuffing it all in ide.c? > > This is probably a sensible idea especially since there may be more once > we go ahead with the in-kernel solution. Sorry, I forgot to mention that I haven't a clue as to what headers to include explicitly in such a file. Actually, ide-park.c compiles on my system just with ide.h included. This would, however, be an unsuitably minimal approach, I fear. Some advice would be most welcome. Regards, Elias