From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Elias Oltmanns Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE: Fix HDIO_DRIVE_RESET handling Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87wskgtwwm.fsf@denkblock.local> References: <87k5gmz596.fsf@denkblock.local> <200806192247.25063.bzolnier@gmail.com> <87wskhuk98.fsf@denkblock.local> <87r6apuk16.fsf@denkblock.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from nebensachen.de ([195.34.83.29]:51937 "EHLO mail.nebensachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754240AbYFWHsK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:48:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r6apuk16.fsf@denkblock.local> (Elias Oltmanns's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:28:21 +0200") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Elias Oltmanns wrote: [...] > @@ -941,6 +949,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t atapi_reset_pollfunc (ide_drive_t *drive) > /* done polling */ > hwgroup->polling = 0; > hwgroup->resetting = 0; Actually, ->resetting needs to be protected by the ide_lock here. [...] > @@ -1005,6 +1014,8 @@ static ide_startstop_t reset_pollfunc (ide_drive_t *drive) > } > hwgroup->polling = 0; /* done polling */ > hwgroup->resetting = 0; /* done reset attempt */ Same as above. Unless I have missed something, a simple spin_lock(&ide_lock) should suffice since there cannot possibly be another interrupt that changes ->resetting behind our back. I'll send an updated version of patches 1 and 4 once I have your opinion on the current series. Regards, Elias