From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] simplify init function
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:04:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e48dd5f-16c8-483e-87fc-c53100c2b02b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2826e5d0-e4d9-4aaf-aab6-4d36a9f2e73d@kernel.org>
On 1/14/25 2:03 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 1/14/25 01:34, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> by removing few lines. No functional change.
>
> Looks OK to me, but:
>
> The patch title should be: "ata: ahci: simplify init function"
>
> And the commit message should also describe why it is OK to change
> ahci_init_irq() to be a void function. Can you send a V3 with that addressed
> please ?
sure
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> V2: ahci_init_irq is now a void function
>>
>> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> index 8d27c567be1c..3ea2f3adf354 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> @@ -1665,13 +1665,15 @@ static int ahci_get_irq_vector(struct ata_host *host, int port)
>> return pci_irq_vector(to_pci_dev(host->dev), port);
>> }
>>
>> -static int ahci_init_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
>> +static void ahci_init_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
>> struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
>> {
>> int nvec;
>>
>> - if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI)
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) {
>> + pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_INTX);
>> + return;
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * If number of MSIs is less than number of ports then Sharing Last
>> @@ -1685,7 +1687,7 @@ static int ahci_init_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
>> if (!(readl(hpriv->mmio + HOST_CTL) & HOST_MRSM)) {
>> hpriv->get_irq_vector = ahci_get_irq_vector;
>> hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI;
>> - return nvec;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1700,12 +1702,13 @@ static int ahci_init_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
>>
>> /*
>> * If the host is not capable of supporting per-port vectors, fall
>> - * back to single MSI before finally attempting single MSI-X.
>> + * back to single MSI before finally attempting single MSI-X or
>> + * a legacy INTx.
>> */
>> nvec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI);
>> if (nvec == 1)
>> - return nvec;
>> - return pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>> + return;
>> + pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_INTX);
>> }
>>
>> static void ahci_mark_external_port(struct ata_port *ap)
>> @@ -1985,10 +1988,8 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>> }
>> host->private_data = hpriv;
>>
>> - if (ahci_init_msi(pdev, n_ports, hpriv) < 0) {
>> - /* legacy intx interrupts */
>> - pci_intx(pdev, 1);
>> - }
>> + ahci_init_irq(pdev, n_ports, hpriv);
>> +
>> hpriv->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
>>
>> if (!(hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_SSS) || ahci_ignore_sss)
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 16:34 [PATCH V2] simplify init function Tomas Henzl
2025-01-14 1:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-14 9:00 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-01-14 18:04 ` Tomas Henzl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e48dd5f-16c8-483e-87fc-c53100c2b02b@redhat.com \
--to=thenzl@redhat.com \
--cc=Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox