From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Freemyer Subject: Re: SSD / filesystem / TRIM Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:05:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C759825.60503@web.de> <4C7A2949.8070606@web.de> <4C7CF740.9040907@teksavvy.com> <4C7CFDFD.5000902@teksavvy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: In-Reply-To: <4C7CFDFD.5000902-R6A+fiHC8nRWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> To: Mark Lord Cc: Thomas Hertweck , opensuse-kernel-stAJ6ESoqRxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, IDE/ATA development list List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Mark Lord wrote: > On 10-08-31 08:51 AM, Greg Freemyer wrote: >> >> Does hdparm v.9.30 have any known kernel dependencies that would keep >> it from working with 2.6.31? >> >> Or any other known issues that would argue against opensuse pushing it >> out as a software update for 11.2 and 11.3? >> >> Or at least putting it in a OBS repo so people using wiper.sh/hdparm >> can use the latest if they load if from the repo.. > > > No issues that I know about. > My own opinion, is that _anyone_ using hdparm should be using v9.30. > > Cheers Mark, Thanks Thomas, I opened a bugzilla about it: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635920 I hope you'll add yourself as a cc: and test hdparm v9.30 if and when it is available for test. Thanks Greg