From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1F4269CF0 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739886855; cv=none; b=vCBC/D7nUfGXyahUzwr9rxZk7CgDV/jvENGDZm2ydHvBiUUKpdDSKn03D1+oxmg/f0OCX3voFTFKXFrraLOQipOk8Qx6WGB5licLyzvJC9QRPZtyAz4xgG/cNuVwtHJ1+EIFG8Sx9gMcIeGcLkSCQRUyUJ2odv3h18PYzXmRD8o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739886855; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VzGfcz72KQQgcNuiZFIWHULVI2KF1C3QLfBCBPInql8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D27AWlnoaT/1EzGfR307kCsHx+KO4XCelwv05ScBkbf4Mw7MSragDGkyp+lKlLpDmKY3Sk+od2sQXlaAMjjTgtPBKqyZeulBkuCkQyvNF0JFv8U2BYS/S++F31Z7whTQiOs6ODNTQZZR63715cdbGqhGd04WApqw5vji/5c5D5U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sFi6xecU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sFi6xecU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28CE0C4CEE2; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:54:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739886854; bh=VzGfcz72KQQgcNuiZFIWHULVI2KF1C3QLfBCBPInql8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sFi6xecUwRAxDukt8n3/3ojtL4FBsjYMaUjFFKK4faO878pgkoCxoo4UO9hiRORPn UM1wLMV4nqeRPCQq/LSAPxjyjFiiwcB58c4KaF7z6CHzHHlc8KxoFACa/xi42CmruK 4Ae6GjTbjJqJpL0uBDPpSFVgoh+GmwYmIKFn0OCsMJTtYLgLPqsTg1ed2W2FSkvaMM Z6Z2+S03eapHxIn2g93ChUlkP8SPwEW6M2NggIDV6fIH+B8YUdQlUSUjps8DFSODH4 i++TiYpKlB6Ky+I5d3NUdsRdyIODG1diUh0nfvNXrscTa0E8FWo+RTSYuOER3b4Ucz 019bFPuC0WYCw== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:54:10 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Daniel Baumann Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal , Dieter Mummenschanz Subject: Re: Samsung SSD 870 QVO LPM issues Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/10/25 12:08, Niklas Cassel wrote: > >> Dieter is using 'Samsung SSD 870 QVO 8TB', rev 'SVQ02B6Q'. > [...] > >> Daniel claimed that enabling LPM for his Samsung SSD 870 QVO drive, > >> caused them to stop working. > > We have different firmware versions and all of them don't work for me > with enabled LPM, however I don't know the versions offhand. > > I'll check and report back on Wednesday morning (not in office tomorrow, > sorry). Hello Daniel, Do you have any update on this? Kind regards, Niklas