From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244B22571AD for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740399832; cv=none; b=M2FaFzrjuAjG9DugMmYYKsrqKxCug3MEAPyxeqFhoW5fRtP/5jXg0pnl2UJUJEutJyTLiguXTXgjw8aIwB3OXmYxZhpyOfj7arlYXTTF3NSj/M+FDKNsRQ/YcTGxU822FZSNBn+fnvnAY3QgZylR01Ykj9e4/ZnOIyGQRSO6u6c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740399832; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eP8RIU5Joxzdafywy9Zg3OvqgsMaeqLprVbqabGmmSo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DFR+N3/AGVxYzdQIi+LQVxYAHj87t2gPILl5+l3W3wOQsqADtmh07ip78Nw8/8Q2li2DdZsDAMqaNjjpSfaRmTKS67NXwI3rn2dOz0LjZquubmmAkN8aISG2CqHeSJdESXTsaopibOiXmjonK1vPvOeaVL47U9UVVpK0bac/XfQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UGOhvw99; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UGOhvw99" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88CF1C4CEE6; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:23:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740399831; bh=eP8RIU5Joxzdafywy9Zg3OvqgsMaeqLprVbqabGmmSo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UGOhvw99RVJC9sx0QilI5RX37pqFyHQmw+XGflPpDjiiU1igkCJNshcauaM23vnKN zWERCJOeqIsbP7ZyULBp5WTpmBPzo2QaPet0XPYv0zCmkROGPJQNd8Gxr0nWTIqdIl ZHo0qC6qZamxjc/QHDORDy+yryoEIXVmKL/96Pmwj/ynT3IJHkWtI3X6wMaeAqP9FO I/3kS6RKUylGNwo044u2ObEyrtRsLzL9drEeLDOBbrrh+EddHJpI0ByWeeX542vJ1g ZRKhCvYZyYO0TyOOQppBHcOC7uXpqRaJPhs3wCtTUnQSJxglvjPZvKJ1N9e4QDiDBN jTqApA3pxqGBQ== Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:23:48 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Daniel Baumann Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal , Dieter Mummenschanz Subject: Re: Samsung SSD 870 QVO LPM issues Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/10/25 12:08, Niklas Cassel wrote: > >> Dieter is using 'Samsung SSD 870 QVO 8TB', rev 'SVQ02B6Q'. > [...] > >> Daniel claimed that enabling LPM for his Samsung SSD 870 QVO drive, > >> caused them to stop working. > > We have different firmware versions and all of them don't work for me > with enabled LPM, however I don't know the versions offhand. > > I'll check and report back on Wednesday morning (not in office tomorrow, > sorry). Hello Daniel, Any update on this? Would be nice to have it fixed before 6.14 is officially released. Kind regards, Niklas