From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: "linan666@huaweicloud.com" <linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: "dlemoal@kernel.org" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linan122@huawei.com" <linan122@huawei.com>,
"yukuai3@huawei.com" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
"yi.zhang@huawei.com" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
"houtao1@huawei.com" <houtao1@huawei.com>,
"yangerkun@huawei.com" <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:51:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZONr0f26IT/QKsSu@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810014848.2148316-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:48:48AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
>
> interrupt scsi_eh
>
> ahci_error_intr
> =>ata_port_freeze
> =>__ata_port_freeze
> =>ahci_freeze (turn IRQ off)
> =>ata_port_abort
> =>ata_port_schedule_eh
> =>shost->host_eh_scheduled++;
> host_eh_scheduled = 1
> scsi_error_handler
> =>ata_scsi_error
> =>ata_scsi_port_error_handler
> =>ahci_error_handler
> . =>sata_pmp_error_handler
> . =>ata_eh_thaw_port
> . =>ahci_thaw (turn IRQ on)
> ahci_error_intr .
> =>ata_port_freeze .
> =>__ata_port_freeze .
> =>ahci_freeze (turn IRQ off) .
> =>ata_port_abort .
> =>ata_port_schedule_eh .
> =>shost->host_eh_scheduled++; .
> host_eh_scheduled = 2 .
> =>ata_std_end_eh
> =>host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;
Hello Li Nan,
I do not understand why the code in:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L722-L731
does not kick in, and repeats EH.
EH_PENDING is cleared before ->error_handler() is called:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L697
So ahci_error_intr() from the second error interrupt, which is called after
thawing the port, should have called ata_std_sched_eh(), which calls
ata_eh_set_pending(), which should have set EH_PENDING:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L884
My only guess is that after thawing the port:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2807
The second error irq comes, and sets EH_PENDING,
but then this silly code might clear it:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2825-L2837
I think the best way would be if we could improve this "spurious error
condition check"... because if this is indeed the code that clears EH_PENDING
for you, then this code basically makes the "goto repeat" code in
ata_scsi_port_error_handler() useless...
An alternative to improving the "spurious error condition check" might be for
you to try something like:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 35e03679b0bf..82f032934ae1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void ata_std_end_eh(struct ata_port *ap)
{
struct Scsi_Host *host = ap->scsi_host;
- host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;
+ host->host_eh_scheduled--;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_std_end_eh);
...and see if that improves things for you.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 1:48 [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt linan666
2023-08-10 2:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 6:41 ` Li Nan
2023-08-14 7:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 13:20 ` Li Nan
2023-08-15 2:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 7:41 ` Li Nan
2023-08-21 13:51 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2023-08-22 9:20 ` Li Nan
2023-08-22 10:30 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-09-04 11:45 ` Li Nan
2023-09-04 11:57 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-09-04 13:00 ` Li Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZONr0f26IT/QKsSu@x1-carbon \
--to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linan122@huawei.com \
--cc=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox