public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: "linan666@huaweicloud.com" <linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: "dlemoal@kernel.org" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linan122@huawei.com" <linan122@huawei.com>,
	"yukuai3@huawei.com" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	"yi.zhang@huawei.com" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	"houtao1@huawei.com" <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	"yangerkun@huawei.com" <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:51:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZONr0f26IT/QKsSu@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810014848.2148316-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:48:48AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
> 
> interrupt                            scsi_eh
> 
> ahci_error_intr
>   =>ata_port_freeze
>     =>__ata_port_freeze
>       =>ahci_freeze (turn IRQ off)
>     =>ata_port_abort
>       =>ata_port_schedule_eh
>         =>shost->host_eh_scheduled++;
>         host_eh_scheduled = 1
>                                      scsi_error_handler
>                                        =>ata_scsi_error
>                                          =>ata_scsi_port_error_handler
>                                            =>ahci_error_handler
>                                            . =>sata_pmp_error_handler
>                                            .   =>ata_eh_thaw_port
>                                            .     =>ahci_thaw (turn IRQ on)
> ahci_error_intr                            .
>   =>ata_port_freeze                        .
>     =>__ata_port_freeze                    .
>       =>ahci_freeze (turn IRQ off)         .
>     =>ata_port_abort                       .
>       =>ata_port_schedule_eh               .
>         =>shost->host_eh_scheduled++;      .
>         host_eh_scheduled = 2              .
>                                            =>ata_std_end_eh
>                                              =>host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;

Hello Li Nan,

I do not understand why the code in:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L722-L731

does not kick in, and repeats EH.


EH_PENDING is cleared before ->error_handler() is called:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L697

So ahci_error_intr() from the second error interrupt, which is called after
thawing the port, should have called ata_std_sched_eh(), which calls
ata_eh_set_pending(), which should have set EH_PENDING:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L884



My only guess is that after thawing the port:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2807

The second error irq comes, and sets EH_PENDING,
but then this silly code might clear it:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2825-L2837

I think the best way would be if we could improve this "spurious error
condition check"... because if this is indeed the code that clears EH_PENDING
for you, then this code basically makes the "goto repeat" code in
ata_scsi_port_error_handler() useless...



An alternative to improving the "spurious error condition check" might be for
you to try something like:

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 35e03679b0bf..82f032934ae1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void ata_std_end_eh(struct ata_port *ap)
 {
        struct Scsi_Host *host = ap->scsi_host;
 
-       host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;
+       host->host_eh_scheduled--;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_std_end_eh);



...and see if that improves things for you.



Kind regards,
Niklas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10  1:48 [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt linan666
2023-08-10  2:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14  6:41   ` Li Nan
2023-08-14  7:50     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 13:20       ` Li Nan
2023-08-15  2:41         ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17  7:41           ` Li Nan
2023-08-21 13:51 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2023-08-22  9:20   ` Li Nan
2023-08-22 10:30     ` Niklas Cassel
2023-09-04 11:45       ` Li Nan
2023-09-04 11:57         ` Niklas Cassel
2023-09-04 13:00           ` Li Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZONr0f26IT/QKsSu@x1-carbon \
    --to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linan122@huawei.com \
    --cc=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox