Re: [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt

[Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 07:45:51PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2023/8/22 18:30, Niklas Cassel 写道:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:20:33PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> > > Thanks for your reply, Niklas.
> > > 
> > > 在 2023/8/21 21:51, Niklas Cassel 写道:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:48:48AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hello Li Nan,
> > > > 
> > > > I do not understand why the code in:
> > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L722-L731
> > > > 
> > > > does not kick in, and repeats EH.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > EH_PENDING is cleared before ->error_handler() is called:
> > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L697
> > > > 
> > > > So ahci_error_intr() from the second error interrupt, which is called after
> > > > thawing the port, should have called ata_std_sched_eh(), which calls
> > > > ata_eh_set_pending(), which should have set EH_PENDING:
> > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L884
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > My only guess is that after thawing the port:
> > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2807
> > > > 
> > > > The second error irq comes, and sets EH_PENDING,
> > > > but then this silly code might clear it:
> > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2825-L2837
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I think so.
> > > 
> > > > I think the best way would be if we could improve this "spurious error
> > > > condition check"... because if this is indeed the code that clears EH_PENDING
> > > > for you, then this code basically makes the "goto repeat" code in
> > > > ata_scsi_port_error_handler() useless...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > An alternative to improving the "spurious error condition check" might be for
> > > > you to try something like:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > We have used this solution before, but it will case WARN_ON in
> > > ata_eh_finish() as below:
> > > 
> > >    WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 118 at ../drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:4016
> > > ata_eh_finish+0x15a/0x170
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> > How about if you simply move the WARN_ON to ata_scsi_port_error_handler()
> > as well:
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > index 35e03679b0bf..5be2fc651131 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > @@ -741,6 +741,12 @@ void ata_scsi_port_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap)
> >                   */
> >                  ap->ops->end_eh(ap);
> > +               if (!ap->scsi_host->host_eh_scheduled) {
> > +                       /* make sure nr_active_links is zero after EH */
> > +                       WARN_ON(ap->nr_active_links);
> > +                       ap->nr_active_links = 0;
> > +               }
> > +
> >                  spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
> >                  ata_eh_release(ap);
> >          } else {
> > @@ -962,7 +968,7 @@ void ata_std_end_eh(struct ata_port *ap)
> >   {
> >          struct Scsi_Host *host = ap->scsi_host;
> > -       host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;
> > +       host->host_eh_scheduled--;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_std_end_eh);
> > @@ -3948,10 +3954,6 @@ void ata_eh_finish(struct ata_port *ap)
> >                          }
> >                  }
> >          }
> > -
> > -       /* make sure nr_active_links is zero after EH */
> > -       WARN_ON(ap->nr_active_links);
> > -       ap->nr_active_links = 0;
> >   }
> >   /**
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Niklas
> 
> We have tested this patch and it can fix the bug. Thank you so much. :)

Awesome! :)

Please send out a real patch, so that it is easier for the maintainer to
apply.

No need to give any credit to me.


Kind regards,
Niklas