From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05212FE581; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756132362; cv=none; b=rvaKFmxPUXNMBH2MAesz5Qlpp/xkFerUU/SKfTXcIoOtlqi/YtFO9qUgSjde1sEIck4M0f9LjgFbLzGFxb5rEvRBuXjB6DUdWyWUBhPQ8m85JpvwgUQojiBmfA/49tA3flosM8W6RLpXW2O3I2NrUXZNy4Z0HyIncL44H02QLBY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756132362; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DU+1S4Dtf6BzIA9TMfJpqm5TRVwGVofXB+Dj9RHsm1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h5U2W8teEHwEHSAEReWUSuboArGJz/KcccWbLgRYbbEqsTqBX7LtXHdcNag1oRJzbwFhEryM52hhe0TnA5ZWLQyqFZVJgJ3hsiVibG+jzAkGTNAQkhNYKhjeeNexmu3cbMcSiMUUWrzRocKGYTpXeRxqMADeLqRxW5OjwxAsRf8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=n7YZsnMU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="n7YZsnMU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28395C4CEED; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756132360; bh=DU+1S4Dtf6BzIA9TMfJpqm5TRVwGVofXB+Dj9RHsm1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=n7YZsnMUaPKieR6Aen8NXplrqXq649ng2cWds08Paw0ZE1V9/s04MYuzfMJunBPPM e9q5l/4IYbHR+zLW6tZ3Ain+SM/EPsptEidQNiwcBG+gIXbD0MDb3NpuMIodH9q/bK gfUkw7ZqtLUllteesZei9c9/9Nob4tERnp37xBWgOfA8ssretvfGAj7ddnS1nJ/eSw gYK9m1P9+EEv6DvwLeTd0I1ynl3rIVfEsEIPpMbPhXNcaQgQQCdndA/xeV7DIotpxx J60e7ZU1ZivKd3L40DdBa/CHbHS/SOS0E/lE/sJu2Rz1DevUCKw6IvTf/zpKfAvZXV BIxp/l6R3haNQ== Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:32:20 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Mika =?iso-8859-1?Q?Penttil=E4?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Brendan Jackman , Christoph Lameter , Dennis Zhou , Dmitry Vyukov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Johannes Weiner , John Hubbard , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Liam R. Howlett" , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes , Marco Elver , Marek Szyprowski , Michal Hocko , Muchun Song , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador , Peter Xu , Robin Murphy , Suren Baghdasaryan , Tejun Heo , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org, Zi Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap() Message-ID: References: <20250821200701.1329277-1-david@redhat.com> <20250821200701.1329277-11-david@redhat.com> <9156d191-9ec4-4422-bae9-2e8ce66f9d5e@redhat.com> <7077e09f-6ce9-43ba-8f87-47a290680141@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 02:48:58PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 23.08.25 10:59, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 08:24:31AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 22.08.25 06:09, Mika Penttilä wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8/21/25 23:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > > > > > All pages were already initialized and set to PageReserved() with a > > > > > refcount of 1 by MM init code. > > > > > > > > Just to be sure, how is this working with MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT, where MM is supposed not to > > > > initialize struct pages? > > > > > > Excellent point, I did not know about that one. > > > > > > Spotting that we don't do the same for the head page made me assume that > > > it's just a misuse of __init_single_page(). > > > > > > But the nasty thing is that we use memblock_reserved_mark_noinit() to only > > > mark the tail pages ... > > > > And even nastier thing is that when CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is > > disabled struct pages are initialized regardless of > > memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(). > > > > I think this patch should go in before your updates: > > Shouldn't we fix this in memblock code? > > Hacking around that in the memblock_reserved_mark_noinit() user sound wrong > -- and nothing in the doc of memblock_reserved_mark_noinit() spells that > behavior out. We can surely update the docs, but unfortunately I don't see how to avoid hacking around it in hugetlb. Since it's used to optimise HVO even further to the point hugetlb open codes memmap initialization, I think it's fair that it should deal with all possible configurations. > -- > Cheers > > David / dhildenb > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.