From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: dayou5941@163.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, liyouhong@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ata: ahci: fail probe if BAR too small for claimed ports
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:14:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae9TGoaQAi7dOVc0@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427060546.1407439-1-dayou5941@163.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:05:46PM +0800, dayou5941@163.com wrote:
> From: Youhong Li <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
>
> When an AHCI controller is disabled in BIOS, its HOST_CAP register may
> contain invalid values (e.g., 0xFFFFFFFF) indicating an impossibly large
> number of ports. If CAP.NP claims more ports than can physically fit
> within the mapped BAR region, accessing port registers beyond the BAR
> boundary causes a kernel panic.
>
> Add validation in ahci_init_one() to check that the BAR size is
> sufficient for the number of ports claimed in CAP.NP. The check
> calculates the required MMIO size as:
>
> required_size = 0x100 (global registers) + max_ports * 0x80
>
> If required_size exceeds the actual BAR size, the probe fails with
> -ENODEV, preventing the panic and providing a clear error message.
>
> This solution follows the suggestion by Damien Le Moal and Niklas Cassel
> to detect and reject obviously broken controller configurations early.
>
> Reported-by: liyouhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: liyouhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> v2:
> - Complete rewrite based on community feedback
> - Move check from libahci.c to ahci.c
> - Fail probe early instead of attempting to work around invalid state
> - Implement BAR size validation as suggested
>
> v3:
> - Fix patch format: add "---" separator and move changelog to correct location
> - Change dev_err to dev_warn as suggested
>
> v4:
> - Break long lines as suggested by Damien
> - Keep complete changelog history
>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 1d73a53370cf..c04bee682605 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -1888,6 +1888,25 @@ static ssize_t remapped_nvme_show(struct device *dev,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(remapped_nvme);
>
> +static int ahci_validate_bar_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *mmio)
static int ahci_validate_bar_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> +{
> + u32 cap = readl(mmio + HOST_CAP);
readl(hpriv->mmio, HOST_CAP);
> + unsigned int max_ports = ahci_nr_ports(cap);
> + u32 last_port_end = 0x100 + (max_ports * 0x80);
> + resource_size_t bar_size =
> + pci_resource_len(pdev, AHCI_PCI_BAR_STANDARD);
pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
> +
> + if (last_port_end > bar_size) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> + "BAR5 too small for %u ports (last port ends at %u, BAR %llu)\n",
"BAR%d too small for %u ports (last port ends at %#x, BAR %pa)\n", bar,
> + max_ports, last_port_end,
> + (unsigned long long)bar_size);
Print resource_size_t as %pa instead of casting to unsigned long long
and pass bar_size by reference (&bar_size):
https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/printk-formats.html#physical-address-types-phys-addr-t
> + return -ENODEV;
return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> {
> unsigned int board_id = ent->driver_data;
> @@ -1988,6 +2007,10 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> if (!hpriv->mmio)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + rc = ahci_validate_bar_size(pdev, hpriv->mmio);
Please let this function be called with the arguments:
ahci_validate_bar_size(pdev, ahci_pci_bar, hpriv);
Such that it takes the same arguments as ahci_remap_check().
Kind regards,
Niklas
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> /* detect remapped nvme devices */
> ahci_remap_check(pdev, ahci_pci_bar, hpriv);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 6:05 [PATCH v4] ata: ahci: fail probe if BAR too small for claimed ports dayou5941
2026-04-27 12:14 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-04-27 20:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 20:32 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-27 21:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 22:10 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae9TGoaQAi7dOVc0@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dayou5941@163.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liyouhong@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox