Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:06:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alCoB5FOGJTljbjU@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <724b4a01-e396-4cc0-be2a-9860f42d803f@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 04:25:38PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > [Severity: High]
> > Does this function need to set ATA_PFLAG_EH_PENDING?
> > 
> > Because this flag is not set, ata_port_eh_scheduled() will evaluate to
> > false. This allows the block layer to immediately retry the requeued
> > commands, which __ata_scsi_queuecmd() will accept and re-defer, keeping
> > the host busy.
> 
> No it will not because this is called with SCSI EH already waiting to run, so
> newly incoming commands are not passed down by the scsi layer.

Could you please point to specific functions + lines in the code?

AFAICT, I don't see how SCSI EH is waiting to run when
scsi_eh_scmd_add() has not yet been called.

Note that all the places that currently call ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc()
are called when ATA_PFLAG_EH_PENDING | ATA_PFLAG_EH_IN_PROGRESS
(ata_port_eh_scheduled() evaluates to true).

We could add an WARN_ON(!ata_port_eh_scheduled) in ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc()
and we would never see the warning.

With the new function ata_scsi_port_eh_timed_out(), AFAICT, it can call
ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() before ata_port_eh_scheduled() evaluates to true.

See e.g. the commit message for:
e20e81a24a4d ("ata: libata-core: do not issue non-internal commands once EH is pending")
of why I think __ata_scsi_queuecmd() will accept new commands.


Kind regards,
Niklas

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10  0:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  0:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10  7:25     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  8:06       ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-07-10  8:29         ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  8:48           ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10  8:39     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10  7:32   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10  0:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: libsas: " Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  1:53   ` Jason Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alCoB5FOGJTljbjU@fedora \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox