From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc6-2450cf in scsi_lib.c (was: Large amount of scsi-sgpool)objects Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:16:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20090305182958Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090305100901.GU11787@kernel.dk> <20090305101436.GV11787@kernel.dk> <20090305192737I.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090305103023.GW11787@kernel.dk> <20090305104159.GE32407@elte.hu> <20090305110534.GX11787@kernel.dk> <20090305110736.GJ32407@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jens Axboe , FUJITA Tomonori , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, jengelh@medozas.de, bharrosh@panasas.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Jens, > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > It pulled without conflicts so we are good. Started testing it. > > Once Thomas is around i suspect he'll be able to test it too > > with his reproducer. > > I started the tests on the reproducer machine and the first result > looks good so far. I let the tests run in a loop to make sure that it > fixes the problem for real. Will report later today what the long run > outcome is. Still up and running. Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner