Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: snoep <snoepke@live.nl>
Cc: "alvinwylim@gmail.com" <alvinwylim@gmail.com>,
	"artmoty@gmail.com" <artmoty@gmail.com>,
	"david.laight.linux@gmail.com" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	"kernel@wantstofly.org" <kernel@wantstofly.org>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mario.limonciello@amd.com" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	"mikael1022bzh@gmail.com" <mikael1022bzh@gmail.com>,
	"roland.waltersson@netinsight.net"
	<roland.waltersson@netinsight.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: force 32-bit DMA for JMicron JMB582/JMB585
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 12:28:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap6RyP28fxXNjRWS@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM8P193MB2659454F98AD53DEB002CF8AA9B42@AM8P193MB2659.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hello Sven,

On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 09:04:57PM +0000, snoep wrote:
> So I was unable to reproduce the corruption on this Raspberry Pi 5
> with either the normal 64-bit DMA configuration or the Raspberry Pi
> 32-bit PCIe DMA overlay.
> 
> Again, since this JMB585 has no IOMMU group, I do not consider this a
> test of the Intel/ARM IOMMU enforcing-mode case.

Thank you for your testing!

Considering that Rasberry Pi seems to hand out 64-bit PCI addresses by
default, which is why they even have the (from JMB585's point of view)
completely meaningless pcie-32bit-dma-pi5 DT overlay.

Considering that you could run the reproducer for several iterations
without any issues, I am confident that JMB585 does indeed handle
64-bit DMA addresses perfectly fine, and we will drop the JMB585 quirk
as soon as there is fix for the AMD IOMMU issue.


> 
> However, I am still trying to determine what caused the repeated EXT4
> metadata corruption in the original RAID1 setup, and I would appreciate
> guidance on what would be most useful to test next.
> 
> Would repeating a sustained checksumming workload with the original
> two-SSD md RAID1 setup be useful, or is there another workload, tracing
> option, kernel configuration or test that would better help distinguish
> between the JMB585/PCIe path, md RAID1, EXT4, or another component?

I have no idea why you saw corruption on ext4 using 6.12.75+rpt-rpi-2712
downstream kernel.

Considering that they seem okay with carrying dirty workarounds for issues
for several months, that they don't even bother reporting to upstream, I
would strongly recommend running an upstream kernel instead.


I did see some reports from people that the JMB585 could overheat:
https://github.com/geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-pcie-devices/issues/354
https://forums.truenas.com/t/jmb585-m-2-to-sata-card-doesnt-see-ssd/8231

If you don't have a heatsink, perhaps it could be something to try.


Kind regards,
Niklas

       reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <AM8P193MB2659454F98AD53DEB002CF8AA9B42@AM8P193MB2659.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2026-09-07 10:28 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-06 11:48 [PATCH] ahci: force 32-bit DMA for JMicron JMB582/JMB585 snoep
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-03 13:35 Roland Waltersson
2026-09-03 21:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-03 22:36   ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-04  5:20     ` Roland Waltersson
2026-09-04 11:14       ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-04 12:38         ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-04 12:50           ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-04 16:55             ` Mikael Etienne
2026-09-05 11:38               ` Alvin Lim
2026-09-05 12:26                 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-06  5:05                   ` Alvin Lim
2026-09-06 19:27                     ` John Smith
2026-09-05 14:13               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2026-04-03  5:04 Arthur Husband
2026-04-03  7:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-03  8:12 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-03  8:19 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-03  5:02 Arthur Husband

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ap6RyP28fxXNjRWS@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=alvinwylim@gmail.com \
    --cc=artmoty@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mikael1022bzh@gmail.com \
    --cc=roland.waltersson@netinsight.net \
    --cc=snoepke@live.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox