From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Hajo Noerenberg <hajo-linux-ide@noerenberg.de>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
risc4all@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: ahci: work around lost interrupts on Marvell 88SE61xx
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apUo9Jc2f61cH4WE@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828190452.ic5j5bdnnbx2hs4f@pali>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 09:04:52PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2026 09:05:21 Hajo Noerenberg wrote:
> > ahci_single_level_irq_intr() services the ports first and clears the
> > global HOST_IRQ_STAT afterwards, as recommended by AHCI 1.1 section
> > 10.6.2. The Marvell 88SE6111/6121/6145 family stops reporting interrupts
> > for a port when HOST_IRQ_STAT is cleared while PxIS still holds bits:
> > PxIS keeps its content, HOST_IRQ_STAT reads back as 0, the port is never
> > looked at again, and the command in flight only ends in a timeout.
> >
> > Measured on a Seagate Blackarmor NAS440 (Marvell 88F6281 Kirkwood,
> > 88SE6121 rev B2 behind PCIe) by polling the AHCI registers from userspace
> > while an IDENTIFY was outstanding:
> >
> > t=303.046 irqs 127 PxIS 0x00000000 PxCI 0x00000001
> > IDENTIFY issued
> > t=303.057 irqs 128 PxIS 0x00000020 PxCI 0x00000000
> > CI cleared, DPS set, one interrupt taken
> > ... PxIS stays 0x00000020, HOST_IRQ_STAT stays 0 ...
> > t~308.05 qc timeout after 5000 msecs
> >
> > The command had completed - PxCI was clear and PxIS had DPS set - so
> > ahci_qc_complete() would have completed it. It never got the chance
> > because the handler read HOST_IRQ_STAT as 0 and returned IRQ_NONE.
> >
> > Marvell's own driver for these chips clears the two registers in the
> > opposite order and says so ("clear global before channel"), and
> > ahci_xgene handles its broken edge latch the same way. Since the
> > reordering costs at most one spurious interrupt per valid one on
> > conforming controllers, do it in a private interrupt handler selected for
> > board_ahci_mv instead of changing libahci for everyone.
> >
> > With this applied, SATA-2 and SATA-3 disks work at 3.0 Gbps on the
> > 88SE6121 without the drive-side 1.5 Gbps jumper that was needed before.
> > Time from link up to a successful IDENTIFY:
> >
> > WDC WD5000AADS-00S9B0 port 0 7 ms (never identified before)
> > WDC WD3202ABYS-01B7A0 port 1 28 ms
> > WDC WD30EFRX-68EUZN0 port 1 200 ms (3 TB, HPA detection ok)
> >
> > Only the 88SE6121 was tested; board_ahci_mv also covers the 88SE6145,
> > which Marvell's driver treats identically.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/db6b48b7-d69a-564b-24f0-75fbd6a9e543@noerenberg.de/
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216094
> > Signed-off-by: Hajo Noerenberg <hajo-linux-ide@noerenberg.de>
>
> Thank you for successfully addressing this issue after working on it for
> a longer time. It is very nice to see a successful story at the end.
>
> For me the change looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
>
> As this change is fixing the support for more disks, I would suggest to
> backport this change also into older kernels, ideally by cc: stable
> line (so it would be automatic).
This patch does not apply.
Looking at the line numbers, this patch looks like it is based on some ancient kernel.
Please:
1) Rebase patch on top of 7.3-rc1
2) Add Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
3) Add Fixes: cd70c26617f4 ("[libata] AHCI: Add support for Marvell AHCI-like chips (initially 6145)")
Tip: if you use:
$ git format-patch --base=HEAD~ -1
the SHA1 that your patch is based on will be included in the patch trailer.
Kind regards,
Niklas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 7:05 [PATCH v2] ata: ahci: work around lost interrupts on Marvell 88SE61xx Hajo Noerenberg
2026-08-28 7:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-28 19:04 ` Pali Rohár
2026-08-31 7:10 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apUo9Jc2f61cH4WE@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hajo-linux-ide@noerenberg.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=risc4all@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox