From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5053DDAF9; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788946060; cv=none; b=aMvpkxWg2WTxxeo72mYBI0+FiIFObpF1RP61iv6EX5j4pjDwSB/qDSqwH3cDUtMv8+p3GqzDKAy4rrcC02xWP/I0vpoY2Hd0C7SbQy5A2xX1ySgkyo9l8svBpepj3FLV8Dc/gbsx0BcOO7F4F4BxAEqX9Qq9TftWRHJJfdrvfOA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788946060; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cMtY+OlZvXnCmWMc74UhI/h6ytHWZ75p+IOydXYRyEk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=To6c03b4tCn+UpY9Pa0MFubZGMwiOC4I1L+Dz0QwAh5mVQIHP1CRoBSgj2XRrDhxKb72vAYwTpAbvYDrQWmwwe3+DA+nvHxCwsMISrbEvMtKkEu5goUMo++d6z/U8Xa0logfF7x1trdidYwSwWuT6uKMkY0p/c/ZwlXdjMELWSM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=doqP2yZo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="doqP2yZo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 013CE1F00A3E; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:27:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788946051; bh=o0951nSG+rxS5NfdN16h+hq0RtUDQKHbZiM+0cviWtg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=doqP2yZowAoVYjhp3ZmJ6eCm363/sejxhrWbJriBOJruRb3GEMb63p21RBb34l3YV 7/h9fzt2QelAt+TWqlvSvD+zLEKo9ZNSF+Icbuj86Y4P20GaYY6jCvJ9ADeyI9t+mD aLmbez/GgP1m2oRi89nL63lnGpoR/UVvEAdRy92pfrarIhBYqz68Z6DOyoZB+QBS7d nB0iJtFGpxmE5MBlaCKQt4PHla57kz+Ni+4aUfNSX1jyHBNkkvpmT5KrsGkCRT9w6o 9Di6EZ17x2mJUPzUeAkXvcJibAixJhXWmj5yYtv0qgvZDoXdVl3J8Wjg/IOvli7ifu 06AW9AjSCF4mQ== Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:27:27 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, dlemoal@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: Don't enable interrupt if libATA core registration fails Message-ID: References: <20260908141538.731237-1-nik.borisov@suse.com> <20260908143042.964151F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> <8e426afc-b534-454f-9880-2b25764f370a@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8e426afc-b534-454f-9880-2b25764f370a@suse.com> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 05:34:51PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 8.09.26 г. 17:30 ч., sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider: > > > > New issues: > > - [Low] The patch introduces a `goto err;` statement in `sata_dwc_probe()`, but there is no label named `err:` defined in the function, resulting in a compilation error. > > Fair point, however I'd like to hear from an expert whether enabling the > interrupt without properly registering with libata core is fine or not? I.e > whether this particular fix makes sense? Your fix makes sense. Kind regards, Niklas