From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>,
Shao Mingyin <shao.mingyin@zte.com.cn>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ata: libata-scsi: reject MODE SELECT mode pages with a wrong SPF bit
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 13:37:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au8bpVOcd2JrPmwe@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1af3f18a-5595-4591-8fbc-e5e4d889b036@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 06:22:08AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 11/4/26 05:54, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > ata_scsi_mode_select_xlat() accepts the caching and control mode pages
> > both in page_0 format and in sub_page format with SUBPAGE CODE 00h.
> >
> > However, SAT-2 and later versions of SAT define the SPF bit of the
> > Caching mode page and of the Control mode page as not changeable and
> > set to zero (see SAT-6, 10.4.9 and 10.4.6), and SPC-7 (6.12, MODE
> > SELECT(10) command) requires the device server to terminate a MODE
> > SELECT command with INVALID FIELD IN PARAMETER LIST if the application
> > client sets any field that is reported as not changeable to a value
> > other than its current value.
> >
> > Reject a mode page with the SPF bit set to one and SUBPAGE CODE 00h,
> > with the FIELD POINTER set to the byte containing the SPF bit. The only
> > mode page with the SPF bit set to one that remains accepted is the ATA
> > Feature Control mode page (control mode page, sub-page f2h), for which
> > SAT-6 (12.3.4) requires the SPF bit to be set to one. The opposite case
> > does not need a check: a mode page in page_0 format always has subpage
> > code 00h, so it can never be the ATA Feature Control mode page.
> >
> > This also allows the mode page handlers to rely on the format of their
> > mode page, which a later patch will make use of.
> >
> > Fixes: 1b26d29ccd59 ("[libata] scsi: implement MODE SELECT command")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > index d7923bc664d6..7b0a02903fda 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > @@ -4629,6 +4629,16 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_mode_select_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> > goto invalid_param_len;
> >
> > spg = p[1];
> > + /*
> > + * Mode pages with subpage code 00h use the page_0 format: SAT
> > + * defines the SPF bit of the Caching and Control mode pages,
> > + * for subpage code 00h, as not changeable and set to zero.
> > + */
> > + if (!spg) {
> > + fp = hdr_len + bd_len;
> > + goto invalid_param;
> > + }
>
> The comment block in-between the assignment and test is odd. Can you move the
> assignment right before the if, after the comment block? That makes the code a
> lot prettier :)
Fixed up while applying.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 20:54 [PATCH 0/8] ata: libata-scsi: MODE SELECT fixes and cleanups Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] ata: libata-scsi: fix MODE SELECT handling of data after the mode page Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] ata: libata-scsi: do not accept subpage code FFh in MODE SELECT Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] ata: libata-scsi: reject MODE SELECT mode pages with a wrong SPF bit Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-07 12:37 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] ata: libata-scsi: fix MODE SELECT field pointer for unsupported subpages Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] ata: libata-scsi: fix MODE SELECT field pointer for block descriptor length Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] ata: libata-scsi: pass the whole mode page to the MODE SELECT handlers Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] ata: libata-scsi: set the field pointer when rejecting CDL Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-03 20:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] ata: libata-scsi: document the MODE SENSE mode page functions Niklas Cassel
2026-11-03 21:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-11-07 12:25 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/8] ata: libata-scsi: MODE SELECT fixes and cleanups Niklas Cassel
2026-11-07 12:27 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au8bpVOcd2JrPmwe@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=ipylypiv@google.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shao.mingyin@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox