From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Paul Ausbeck <paula@soe.ucsc.edu>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
Joe Breuer <linux-kernel@jmbreuer.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] ata: libata-scsi: link ata port and scsi device
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:13:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3af36cd-a126-24ac-739c-5d1a192c2b2b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <764fa7a6-109f-0ea5-5d25-3e39874e9c8a@oracle.com>
On 9/12/23 00:15, John Garry wrote:
> On 11/09/2023 12:48, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> For hisi_sas v3, RPM is supported and a link was required to be added in
>>> that driver between the sdev and those host controller device - see
>>> 16fd4a7c59. And that is for a similar reason here. I see that we already
>>> have an ancestry for libata between ata_dev -> ata_link -> ata_port ->
>>> ata_host dev, so it seems reasonable to add ata_dev <-> sdev dependency
>>> here.
>> libata creates a link between ata_port and sdev. This is not very natural, but
>> as I said in the cover letter, the power management model is weird as everything
>> is per port, even if a port has multiple devices. Nevertheless, I tried to apply
>> the same for libsas but failed: if I add the link creation in the slave_alloc
>> method, I fail to get the scsi disks to show up (no /dev/sdX device files). Not
>> sure why. That was with my pm8001 adapter, which is the only libsas one I have.
>>
>> Side note: having an ata_debug (ata equivalent of scsi_debug) driver that could
>> act as a pure libata driver or as a libsas adapter would really be awesome for
>> this kind of tests 😄
>
> hmm... maybe scsi_debug could be modified to support ATA devices (with
> libata).
>
> Regardless, I'm happy to check the code change which you attempted if
> shared.
I had a closer look at what the hisi_sas driver is doing. The link it creates
with device_add_link() is between the scsi device gendev and the hisi_hba->dev,
that is, the HBA device. So nothing to do with libata port of device.
Trying to mimic what libata is now doing, I tried this:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
index 12e2653846e3..91d76258e6ea 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
@@ -624,6 +624,26 @@ int sas_ata_init(struct domain_device *found_dev)
return rc;
}
+int sas_ata_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+{
+ struct domain_device *dev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
+ struct ata_port *ap = dev->sata_dev.ap;
+ struct device *sdev_dev = &sdev->sdev_gendev;
+ struct device_link *link;
+
+ ata_sas_slave_configure(sdev, ap);
+
+ link = device_link_add(sdev_dev, &ap->tdev,
+ DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
+ if (!link && pm_runtime_enabled(sdev_dev)) {
+ dev_err(sdev_dev,
+ "add device link failed, disabling runtime PM for the
host\n");
+ pm_runtime_disable(sdev_dev);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void sas_ata_task_abort(struct sas_task *task)
{
struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = task->uldd_task;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
index a6dc7dc07fce..82c6d8e1e8c7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ void sas_enable_revalidation(struct sas_ha_struct *ha);
void sas_queue_deferred_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha);
void __sas_drain_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha);
+int sas_ata_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev);
+
void sas_deform_port(struct asd_sas_phy *phy, int gone);
void sas_porte_bytes_dmaed(struct work_struct *work);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
index 9047cfcd1072..b6c419aa563e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
@@ -810,10 +810,8 @@ int sas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *scsi_dev)
BUG_ON(dev->rphy->identify.device_type != SAS_END_DEVICE);
- if (dev_is_sata(dev)) {
- ata_sas_slave_configure(scsi_dev, dev->sata_dev.ap);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (dev_is_sata(dev))
+ return sas_ata_slave_configure(scsi_dev);
sas_read_port_mode_page(scsi_dev);
This does not change the drive discovery, all drives connected to the HBA are
found and identified:
[ 52.974154] scsi host12: pm80xx
[ 54.445986] sas: phy-12:4 added to port-12:0, phy_mask:0x10 (50010860002f5644)
[ 54.449019] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 0, pid:423
[ 54.461108] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 54.465601] sas: ata13: end_device-12:0: dev error handler
[ 54.618588] ata13.00: ATA-11: WDC WUH721818ALN604, PCGNW232, max UDMA/133
[ 56.295486] ata13.00: 4394582016 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32)
[ 56.306849] ata13.00: Features: NCQ-sndrcv NCQ-prio
[ 56.320849] ata13.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 56.324504] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1
[ 56.340346] scsi 12:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WUH721818AL W232
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 56.347160] sas: DONE DISCOVERY on port 0, pid:423, result:0
[ 56.348161] sas: phy-12:5 added to port-12:1, phy_mask:0x20 (50010860002f5645)
[ 56.351291] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 1, pid:423
[ 56.363285] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 56.368788] sas: ata13: end_device-12:0: dev error handler
[ 56.368859] sas: ata14: end_device-12:1: dev error handler
[ 56.522903] ata14.00: ATA-11: WDC WUH721818ALN604, PCGNWTW2, max UDMA/133
[ 58.402015] ata14.00: 4394582016 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32)
[ 58.406207] ata14.00: Features: NCQ-sndrcv NCQ-prio
[ 58.420254] ata14.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 58.423222] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1
[ 58.438869] scsi 12:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WUH721818AL WTW2
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 58.445619] sas: DONE DISCOVERY on port 1, pid:423, result:0
[ 58.446687] sas: phy-12:6 added to port-12:2, phy_mask:0x40 (50010860002f5646)
[ 58.449803] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 2, pid:423
[ 58.461732] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 58.465369] sas: ata13: end_device-12:0: dev error handler
[ 58.465426] sas: ata14: end_device-12:1: dev error handler
[ 58.465432] sas: ata15: end_device-12:2: dev error handler
[ 58.622345] ata15.00: ATA-12: WDC WUH722222ALN604, LNGNW1TZ, max UDMA/133
[ 59.540468] ata15.00: 5371330560 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32)
[ 59.588217] ata15.00: Features: NCQ-sndrcv NCQ-prio CDL
[ 59.697588] ata15.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 59.700514] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1
[ 59.716067] scsi 12:0:2:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WUH722222AL W1TZ
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 59.723838] sas: DONE DISCOVERY on port 2, pid:423, result:0
[ 59.724893] sas: phy-12:7 added to port-12:3, phy_mask:0x80 (50010860002f5647)
[ 59.727852] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 3, pid:423
[ 59.739699] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 59.743344] sas: ata13: end_device-12:0: dev error handler
[ 59.743402] sas: ata14: end_device-12:1: dev error handler
[ 59.743405] sas: ata15: end_device-12:2: dev error handler
[ 59.743429] sas: ata16: end_device-12:3: dev error handler
[ 59.898839] ata16.00: ATA-11: WDC WSH722020ALN604, PCGMW803, max UDMA/133
[ 62.348080] ata16.00: 4882956288 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32)
[ 62.353731] ata16.00: Features: NCQ-sndrcv NCQ-prio
[ 62.370011] ata16.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 62.373532] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1
[ 62.389238] scsi 12:0:3:0: Direct-Access-ZBC ATA WDC WSH722020AL W803
PQ: 0 ANSI: 7
[ 62.396642] sas: DONE DISCOVERY on port 3, pid:423, result:0
But no scsi disk added:
# lsscsi
[12:0:0:0] disk ATA WDC WUH721818AL W232 -
[12:0:1:0] disk ATA WDC WUH721818AL WTW2 -
[12:0:2:0] disk ATA WDC WUH722222AL W1TZ -
[12:0:3:0] zbc ATA WDC WSH722020AL W803 -
(no /dev/sdX device).
While not printed on this run, I often see messages like
scsi 12:0:0:0: deferred probe error
No idea why... I do not see where that comes from.
This is all with pm8001 driver.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 4:01 [PATCH 00/19] Fix libata suspend/resume handling and code cleanup Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 4:01 ` [PATCH 01/19] ata: libata-core: Fix ata_port_request_pm() locking Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:41 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 02/19] ata: libata-core: Fix port and device removal Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 6:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:43 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 03/19] ata: libata-scsi: link ata port and scsi device Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 6:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 10:38 ` John Garry
2023-09-11 11:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 15:15 ` John Garry
2023-09-12 6:13 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-09-12 8:49 ` John Garry
2023-09-12 9:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-12 9:19 ` John Garry
2023-09-13 1:43 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 04/19] ata: libata-scsi: Disable scsi device manage_start_stop Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 6:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-14 16:37 ` Phillip Susi
2023-09-13 1:44 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 05/19] ata: libata-scsi: Fix delayed scsi_rescan_device() execution Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:44 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-14 17:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-14 22:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 06/19] ata: libata-core: Do not register PM operations for SAS ports Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:44 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 07/19] scsi: sd: Do not issue commands to suspended disks on remove Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:45 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-13 20:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-14 0:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-14 14:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 08/19] scsi: Remove scsi device no_start_on_resume flag Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:45 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-14 17:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 09/19] ata: libata-scsi: Cleanup ata_scsi_start_stop_xlat() Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:46 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 10/19] ata: libata-core: Synchronize ata_port_detach() with hotplug Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:46 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 11/19] ata: libata-core: Detach a port devices on shutdown Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:46 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 12/19] ata: libata-core: Remove ata_port_suspend_async() Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:47 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 13/19] ata: libata-core: Remove ata_port_resume_async() Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:47 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 14/19] ata: libata-core: skip poweroff for devices that are runtime suspended Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:48 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 15/19] ata: libata-core: Do not resume ports that have been " Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:48 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 16/19] ata: libata-sata: Improve ata_sas_slave_configure() Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:48 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 17/19] ata: libata-eh: Improve reset error messages Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 10:03 ` John Garry
2023-09-13 1:49 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 18/19] ata: libata-eh: Reduce "disable device" message verbosity Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-11 10:14 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2023-09-13 1:49 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2023-09-11 4:02 ` [PATCH 19/19] ata: libata: Cleanup inline DMA helper functions Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-13 1:49 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3af36cd-a126-24ac-739c-5d1a192c2b2b@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@jmbreuer.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=paula@soe.ucsc.edu \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox