linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 102741] New: pata_hpt370x driver doesn't want to operate with Adaptec 1200A at UDMA/100
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:11:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102741-11633@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102741

            Bug ID: 102741
           Summary: pata_hpt370x driver doesn't want to operate with
                    Adaptec 1200A at UDMA/100
           Product: IO/Storage
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 3.18.0-9
          Hardware: i386
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: IDE
          Assignee: io_ide@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
          Reporter: andi3@gmx.net
        Regression: No

This is an older machine. But hey, it is Linux, so we can expect a good support
instead of the common words from big players "replace your system with a more
modern one, as it's unsupported"

It's a bog-standard 1200 A "RAID" card by Adaptec. Even though I am not using
RAID at the moment, it may also operate as an add-in card for hard drives.
To minimize the mess, I have only ONE drive connected to the card right now.

The card is properly initialized using the pata_hpt370x kernel driver. However,
it will always show as UDMA/66 which simply cannot be. Of course, I've even
tried brand-new cables with it, but I think it has nothing to so with that.

The drive connected to it is a Samsung SpinPoint T133 (HD 400 LD), which
*definitly* can do UDMA/100.
The hardware is capable of doing so, too: 

# lspci -knn |grep HPT
01:09.0 Mass storage controller [0180]: HighPoint Technologies, Inc. 
HPT366/368/370/370A/372/372N [1103:0004] (rev 03)
 Subsystem: HighPoint Technologies, Inc. HPT370 UDMA100 [1103:0005]

# modinfo pata_hpt37x
filename:       /lib/modules/3.18.0-9-generic/kernel/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.ko
version:        0.6.23
license:        GPL
description:    low-level driver for the Highpoint HPT37x/30x
author:         Alan Cox
srcversion:     9767DBC95C3C8CD9B426A96
alias:          pci:v00001103d00000006sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001103d00000008sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001103d00000005sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001103d00000007sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001103d00000004sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
depends:        
intree:         Y
vermagic:       3.18.0-9-generic SMP mod_unload modversions 686 
signer:         Magrathea: Glacier signing key
sig_key:        64:24:93:B2:42:A8:8A:D6:3A:5D:EE:4A:7A:65:66:84:4C:ED:13:23
sig_hashalgo:   sha512

Now let's take a look at the dmesg from kernel:

[    1.992359] pata_hpt37x: HPT370 using 33MHz bus clock
[    2.015478] scsi host10: pata_hpt37x
[    2.023431] scsi host11: pata_hpt37x

[    2.023610] ata11: PATA max UDMA/66 cmd 0x8c00 ctl 0x9000 bmdma 0x9c00 irq
19
[    2.023614] ata12: PATA max UDMA/66 cmd 0x9400 ctl 0x9800 bmdma 0x9c08 irq
19

('ata12' is the Samsung drive; 'ata11' is currently empty.)

This can't be correct.
Why only at such low speed, i. e. UDMA/66?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-12 17:11 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2015-08-12 17:30 ` [Bug 102741] pata_hpt370x driver refuses to operate with Adaptec 1200A at UDMA/100 bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-12 17:56 ` [Bug 102741] pata_hpt37x " bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-12 18:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-12 19:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-12 20:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-12 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-14 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102741-11633@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).