Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250708)

Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28T05:33:48Z

On 7/25/25 3:43 PM, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> For some context in our kms_pm_rpm tests, we enable min_power policy for SATA
> so that we can reach deep runtime power states and restore the original policy
> after finishing. [5][6]
>
> IIUC, the above change is based on spec and not something which can be
> reverted. So as I see it, we have to drop this code path for external ports.
> However I am not sure if we can achieve deep power states without enforcing it
> through the sysfs entry.
>
> Atleast for the basic-rte subtest, the test passes if we comment out the
> functions controlling the SATA ports. We will need more testing to determine if
> this approach work. Any thoughts on it?
>
> Also, are there other ways to detect a port is external other than receiving
> EOPNOTSUPP on the sysfs write?

I completely forgot to mention one important thing: please check your test
machine BIOS settings and see if you have "hotplug support" set to enable for
SATA ports. If it is, set that BIOS setting to disable and you will see the
SATA port as a regular one, not as an external port. So LPM support will be
back and your test program will not need changes.

Not all BIOSes have such setting though. Most of the machine I have do have it
though and I checked that it does affect how the ahci driver sees the port
(external or regular with LPM).