Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <nks@flawful.org>
Cc: Runa Guo-oc <RunaGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com>,
	Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata: disallow dev-initiated LPM transitions to unsupported states
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:12:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4b2b1e2-5148-169a-0581-bb1a0d56f896@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230904204257.3296685-1-nks@flawful.org>

On 9/5/23 05:42, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
> 
> In AHCI 1.3.1, the register description for CAP.SSC:
> "When cleared to ‘0’, software must not allow the HBA to initiate
> transitions to the Slumber state via agressive link power management nor
> the PxCMD.ICC field in each port, and the PxSCTL.IPM field in each port
> must be programmed to disallow device initiated Slumber requests."
> 
> In AHCI 1.3.1, the register description for CAP.PSC:
> "When cleared to ‘0’, software must not allow the HBA to initiate
> transitions to the Partial state via agressive link power management nor
> the PxCMD.ICC field in each port, and the PxSCTL.IPM field in each port
> must be programmed to disallow device initiated Partial requests."
> 
> Ensure that we always set the corresponding bits in PxSCTL.IPM, such that
> a device is not allowed to initiate transitions to power states which are
> unsupported by the HBA.
> 
> DevSleep is always initiated by the HBA, however, for completeness, set the
> corresponding bit in PxSCTL.IPM such that agressive link power management
> cannot transition to DevSleep if DevSleep is not supported.
> 
> sata_link_scr_lpm() is used by libahci, ata_piix and libata-pmp.
> However, only libahci has the ability to read the CAP/CAP2 register to see
> if these features are supported. Therefore, in order to not introduce any
> regressions on ata_piix or libata-pmp, create flags that indicate that the
> respective feature is NOT supported. This way, the behavior for ata_piix
> and libata-pmp should remain unchanged.
> 
> This change is based on a patch originally submitted by Runa Guo-oc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>

Applied to for-6.6-fixes. Thanks !


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-04 20:42 [PATCH] ata: libata: disallow dev-initiated LPM transitions to unsupported states Niklas Cassel
2023-09-05  2:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-05  8:26   ` Niklas Cassel
2023-09-05  8:33     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-11  6:12 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f4b2b1e2-5148-169a-0581-bb1a0d56f896@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=RunaGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=nks@flawful.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox