Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AlanCui4080 <me@alancui.cc>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Default IDENTIFY timeout is 5000ms which is too short for enterprise disks
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:18:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8dAJyMVQ4yJA5_7X9Jscw@alancui.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeZUCa5wumWXi_yN@ryzen>

On Tuesday, 21 April 2026 00:27,you wrote:
> From this it seems that it is simply the first IDENTIFY that times out.
> On the second try, it seems that the IDENTIFY passes, otherwise we would
> have seen more "revalidation failed (errno=-5)" prints for the same drive.
> 
> So, from this log alone, I don't see any problem. We will try to do IDENTIFY
> up to three times, so just a single IDENTIFY failing should not be a problem.

So at your opinion, the error is caused by a hardware failure but not kernel, 
so we should not add any quirk to relax or solve the problem, is that correct?
(I just want to confirm that how kernel will deal with this error)

> So I think the question is, at this point, can you read from the drive?
> 
> E.g.:
> # dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null iflag=direct bs=4K count=1

I will be blocked out of the shell for 5 secs unless the IDENTIFY succeed.

> 
> If you can read from the device, then this seem like a problem with zpool
> kicking the device off the RAID array (perhaps because it is taking longer
> than some zpool defined timeout value?), rather than a libata problem.

But after the link re-established, the drive works normally.

Alan



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09 10:21 Default IDENTIFY timeout is 5000ms which is too short for enterprise disks AlanCui4080
2026-04-09 11:55 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-09 12:01 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-15 12:40   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-16 12:59     ` AlanCui4080
2026-04-20 16:27       ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-23  9:18         ` AlanCui4080 [this message]
2026-04-23 11:15           ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-23 14:26             ` AlanCui4080
2026-04-23 16:17               ` Niklas Cassel
2026-05-08 20:48                 ` AlanCui4080
     [not found] ` <14062658.dW097sEU6C@alanarchdesktop>
     [not found]   ` <4482b737-1454-48cb-a941-165aa84fb2eb@kernel.org>
2026-04-10 11:24     ` AlanCui4080
2026-04-10 12:14       ` AlanCui4080

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8dAJyMVQ4yJA5_7X9Jscw@alancui.cc \
    --to=me@alancui.cc \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox