From: Patric Karlsson <patric@ce.chalmers.se>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Promise SATA TX4 300 port timeout with sata_promise in 2.6.22, kernel panic in 2.6.23
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:45:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fh93nq$uif$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4737D2A3.6010103@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I Stratford wrote:
>> The purpose of the mail is to document and share my experience in the
>> hope that someone might find it useful, either for debugging their own
>> TX4 300-centric system issues or figuring out what is up with
>> sata_promise and the TX4 300 in 3Gbps mode. I also wish to offer my
>> somewhat unique promise-based system as a test environment for either
>> the timeout or kernel panic issues. I obviously have some basic need
>> for data integrity of the RAID5, but this system is not in production
>> and is therefore more available for testing purposes than the average
>> machine with 22 Promise SATA ports.. :)
>
> [cc'ing Mikael Pettersson]
>
> It seems those 3Gbps promise controllers have hard time getting out of
> transmission errors. Is it because hardreset doesn't work? Can we fix it?
>
> Also, if 3Gbps can't be made reliable on those controllers, how about
> limiting it to 1.5Gbps by default with appropriate warning messages?
> Without PMP, it's not like we're gonna earn anything by driving the
> thing at 3Gbps.
>
> Thanks.
>
I thought this was supposed to be fixed in 2.6.24-RC2 ?
Although I'm currently running a TX4 myself in 3Gbit mode with 2.6.23.1,
I'm waiting for 2.6.24 to reach stable until I try it out myself.
2.6.23.1 seemed to fix the hard-lock when it tried to reset the card
tho, so now I just get a few errors about "soft resetting" in the logs.
No data loss.
/Patric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-10 12:43 Promise SATA TX4 300 port timeout with sata_promise in 2.6.22, kernel panic in 2.6.23 I Stratford
2007-11-12 4:12 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-12 8:45 ` Patric Karlsson [this message]
2007-11-12 8:58 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-12 19:59 ` Peter Favrholdt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-12 10:25 Mikael Pettersson
2007-11-12 12:01 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-14 8:33 ` I Stratford
2007-11-14 9:38 ` Patric Karlsson
2007-11-15 1:06 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fh93nq$uif$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=patric@ce.chalmers.se \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).