linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patric Karlsson <patric@ce.chalmers.se>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Promise SATA TX4 300 port timeout with sata_promise in 2.6.22, kernel panic in 2.6.23
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:45:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fh93nq$uif$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4737D2A3.6010103@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I Stratford wrote:
>> The purpose of the mail is to document and share my experience in the
>> hope that someone might find it useful, either for debugging their own
>> TX4 300-centric system issues or figuring out what is up with
>> sata_promise and the TX4 300 in 3Gbps mode. I also wish to offer my
>> somewhat unique promise-based system as a test environment for either
>> the timeout or kernel panic issues. I obviously have some basic need
>> for data integrity of the RAID5, but this system is not in production
>> and is therefore more available for testing purposes than the average
>> machine with 22 Promise SATA ports..  :)
> 
> [cc'ing Mikael Pettersson]
> 
> It seems those 3Gbps promise controllers have hard time getting out of
> transmission errors.  Is it because hardreset doesn't work?  Can we fix it?
> 
> Also, if 3Gbps can't be made reliable on those controllers, how about
> limiting it to 1.5Gbps by default with appropriate warning messages?
> Without PMP, it's not like we're gonna earn anything by driving the
> thing at 3Gbps.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I thought this was supposed to be fixed in 2.6.24-RC2 ?

Although I'm currently running a TX4 myself in 3Gbit mode with 2.6.23.1, 
  I'm waiting for 2.6.24 to reach stable until I try it out myself.
2.6.23.1 seemed to fix the hard-lock when it tried to reset the card 
tho, so now I just get a few errors about "soft resetting" in the logs. 
No data loss.

/Patric


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-12  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10 12:43 Promise SATA TX4 300 port timeout with sata_promise in 2.6.22, kernel panic in 2.6.23 I Stratford
2007-11-12  4:12 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-12  8:45   ` Patric Karlsson [this message]
2007-11-12  8:58     ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-12 19:59     ` Peter Favrholdt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-12 10:25 Mikael Pettersson
2007-11-12 12:01 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-14  8:33   ` I Stratford
2007-11-14  9:38     ` Patric Karlsson
2007-11-15  1:06     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='fh93nq$uif$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=patric@ce.chalmers.se \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).