From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hyunjung Ko" <hj351016@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ata: libahci: delete the SW activity blink timer on port stop
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:25:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206736@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110090303.2415681-1-hj351016@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] ata: libahci: ahci_port_stop() skips timers on detached PMP
slots
- [Low] ata: libahci: Fixes trailer cites code movement commit
365cfa1ed5a3
--
commit b31d9e35a39c06af6f90ba34e4a622ba2889d52f
Author: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>
> ata: libahci: delete the SW activity blink timer on port stop
>
> The software activity LED support arms a per-EM-port timer (emp->timer,
> ahci_sw_activity_blink) from ahci_sw_activity() on I/O, and the timer
> callback re-arms itself while the LED is blinking. The timer lives in
> struct ahci_em_priv inside the port's ahci_port_priv, which is allocated
> with devm_kzalloc() and freed when the port is torn down.
>
> ahci_port_stop() never deletes this timer - nothing in libahci does - so
> when the SW activity LED is in use and the AHCI port is stopped (driver
> unbind / module unload) while the blink timer is still pending,
> ahci_sw_activity_blink() runs after ahci_port_priv has been freed and
> dereferences the freed ahci_em_priv (use-after-free).
>
> Shut the timers down in ahci_port_stop() before the port private data is
> released, only when ATA_FLAG_SW_ACTIVITY is set and skipping em_priv slots
> that ahci_init_sw_activity() never set up. Because the callback re-arms
> itself, use timer_shutdown_sync() so a concurrent re-arm cannot resurrect
> it.
>
> Not tested on real hardware (needs an AHCI controller with SGPIO
> enclosure management and the software activity LED enabled).
>
> Fixes: 365cfa1ed5a3 ("ahci: Move generic code into libahci")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>
[Severity: Low]
365cfa1ed5a3 ("ahci: Move generic code into libahci") only moved the existing
AHCI code from drivers/ata/ahci.c into drivers/ata/libahci.c. Should the
Fixes tag cite the commit that introduced emp->timer without stopping it in
ahci_port_stop()?
Fixes: 18f7ba4c2f4b ("libata/ahci: enclosure management support")
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> index 5ce34683d4683..cf1b50f6dc52c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> @@ -2605,9 +2605,24 @@ static void ahci_port_stop(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> const char *emsg = NULL;
> struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = ap->host->private_data;
> + struct ahci_port_priv *pp = ap->private_data;
> void __iomem *host_mmio = hpriv->mmio;
> + struct ata_link *link;
> + struct ahci_em_priv *emp;
> int rc;
>
> + /*
> + * Stop the SW activity blink timers before devres frees pp, skipping
> + * the slots that ahci_init_sw_activity() never set up.
> + */
> + if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_SW_ACTIVITY) {
> + ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) {
> + emp = &pp->em_priv[link->pmp];
> + if (emp->timer.function)
> + timer_shutdown_sync(&emp->timer);
> + }
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) miss armed timers in
pp->em_priv[1..EM_MAX_SLOTS - 1] if a Port Multiplier (PMP) was detached
before ahci_port_stop() runs?
During EH recovery in sata_pmp_eh_recover(), ata_eh_recover() can issue
internal commands on PMP fan-out links and arm pp->em_priv[k].timer via
ahci_qc_issue() -> ahci_sw_activity(). If recovery then exhausts pmp_tries,
sata_pmp_eh_recover() calls sata_pmp_detach(), which sets ap->nr_pmp_links = 0
without stopping those timers. When ahci_port_stop() runs,
ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) sees !sata_pmp_attached(ap) and only visits
&ap->link (pmp 0), leaving any pending fan-out link timer to fire after pp and
ap->pmp_link are freed (use-after-free).
Since the loop already checks emp->timer.function, iterating over all
EM_MAX_SLOTS entries in pp->em_priv[] directly would shut down all initialized
timers regardless of whether a PMP was detached.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110090303.2415681-1-hj351016@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 9:03 [PATCH v3] ata: libahci: delete the SW activity blink timer on port stop Hyunjung Ko
2026-11-10 9:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 10:27 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206736@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hj351016@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox