From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:41:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> <1268031640.4389.11.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:48224 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753412Ab0CHPoV (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:44:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Martin K. Petersen's message of "Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:38:35 -0500") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord , tytso@mit.edu, "H. Peter Anvin" , hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox , aschnell@suse.de, knikanth@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de >>>>> "Martin" == Martin K Petersen writes: >>>>> "Martin" == Martin K Petersen writes: Martin> There are 4 KB LBS SSDs out there but in general the industry is Martin> sticking to ATA for local boot. Martin> Thus implying that ATA doesn't support 4 KB LBS, just that Martin> people stick to the tried-and-true 512. *sigh* I haven't had my breakfast tea yet... What I meant to say was that I know ATA supports 4 KB LBS and that nobody appears to care about it. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering