From: "Benoît Monin" <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Josef Bacik" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable <stable@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: buffer: let the block keep its DMA fence
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:43:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <-TPmKHsgTdWh1jJ4sxKceg@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027-llm-char-misc-iio-v1-1-0d818334f6c7@linuxfoundation.org>
On Tuesday, 27 October 2026 at 17:19:05 CET, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
>
> iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf() hands a plain pointer to the fence to the
> buffer implementation, which keeps it in block->fence, and since the fix
> for the fence leak it drops the initial reference right after
> dma_resv_add_fence(). The only reference left is the one of the
> reservation object.
>
> That one does not last until the fence is signalled. dma_resv_add_fence()
> replaces and puts a fence as soon as a later fence of the same context and
> the same usage is added. All the fences of an attachment share a context,
> and an enqueue on an output buffer only waits for the writers, not for the
> read fence of the enqueue before it. A second IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE of
> a buffer which is still queued is refused by iio_dma_can_enqueue_block(),
> but by then its fence has taken the place of the first one. When the DMA
> is done, iio_buffer_signal_dmabuf_done() signals a fence which has been
> freed and schedules the work item in it.
>
> The leak came from the reference which iio_buffer_signal_dmabuf_done()
> takes and iio_buffer_cleanup() drops: with it nobody dropped the initial
> one. Do not take it, and leave the initial reference to the block until
> the cleanup.
>
> Fixes: a09399935508 ("iio: buffer: Fix DMA fence leak in iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf()")
> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Benoît Monin" <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>
> Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
Having the block and the reservation each hold a reference to the fence is a
better fix than mine.
Reviewed-by: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 4294101810fd..a2386dba497c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1931,9 +1931,14 @@ static int iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf(struct iio_dev_buffer_pair *ib,
> if (ret)
> goto err_queue_unlock;
>
> + /*
> + * The reservation object takes a reference of its own, and drops it as
> + * soon as a later fence of this attachment takes the place of this
> + * one. The initial reference stays with the block, which points to the
> + * fence until iio_buffer_cleanup() has run.
> + */
> dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, &fence->base,
> dma_to_ram ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE : DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
> - dma_fence_put(&fence->base);
> dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
>
> cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
> @@ -1989,18 +1994,12 @@ void iio_buffer_signal_dmabuf_done(struct dma_fence *fence, int ret)
> container_of(fence, struct iio_dma_fence, base);
> bool cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
>
> - /*
> - * Get a reference to the fence, so that it's not freed as soon as
> - * it's signaled.
> - */
> - dma_fence_get(fence);
> -
> fence->error = ret;
> dma_fence_signal(fence);
> dma_fence_end_signalling(cookie);
>
> /*
> - * The fence will be unref'd in iio_buffer_cleanup.
> + * The reference of the block will be dropped in iio_buffer_cleanup.
> * It can't be done here, as the unref functions might try to lock the
> * resv object, which can deadlock.
> */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 16:19 [PATCH 00/15] IIO: a bunch of llm-found fixes Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 01/15] iio: buffer: let the block keep its DMA fence Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 9:30 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-29 14:40 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-29 15:43 ` Benoît Monin [this message]
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 02/15] iio: trigger: fail the attach if no sub-IRQ is left Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 9:38 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 03/15] iio: accel: adxl367: don't stay in standby on -EINVAL Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 10:01 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 04/15] iio: accel: adxl380: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 10:02 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 05/15] iio: adc: check the result of ad_sd_init() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 9:40 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 06/15] iio: adc: ad7923: add the AD7927 to the SPI ID table Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 9:35 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 07/15] iio: addac: ad74413r: fix the values of set_multiple Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 9:38 ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 08/15] iio: light: apds9306: push events to the IIO device Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 09/15] iio: light: tsl2591: don't divide by zero in the dark Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 10/15] iio: light: tsl2591: don't divide by zero with low gain Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 2:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-28 4:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 11/15] iio: hid-sensors: fix a division by zero Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 12/15] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: don't disable the IRQ under lock Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 13/15] iio: proximity: sx9500: hand on probe deferral of GPIOs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 2:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 14/15] iio: scmi: use 64-bit divisions for rates and intervals Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-28 1:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-27 16:19 ` [PATCH 15/15] iio: sx9310: use the data of the I2C table Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-27 16:25 ` Biju Das
2026-10-27 16:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=-TPmKHsgTdWh1jJ4sxKceg@bootlin.com \
--to=benoit.monin@bootlin.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox