Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix PM8350 define

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 17/11/2022 17:58, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:21:25 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 17/11/2022 16:56, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:28:33 +0100
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On 17/11/2022 13:22, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:  
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:13:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:    
>>>>>> The defines from include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h were
>>>>>> changed to take sid argument:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.example.dts:99.28-29 syntax error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>    
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I didn't rebase on top of Bjorn's for-next for my series, so didn't
>>>>> see this example.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for fixing!
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>> This should not go via Bjorn's tree without IIO ack and
>>>> Jonathan/Lars-Peter/IIO lists were not in CC.
>>>>  
>>> Thanks for the heads up. 
>>>
>>> Not sure I'd have registered there would have been a problem here even
>>> if I had seen original patch.  Anyhow, I assume Bjorn will pick this up
>>> and all will be well again.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>  
>>
>> I am afraid it cannot go via Bjorn's tree, because this depends on a
>> change in your tree:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221027143411.277980-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>
>> Can you pick it up instead? This is the only way to fix the linux-next,
>> although your tree will have a dt_binding_check error.
>>
>> Other way is to have cross-tree merge, but the commit to bindings
>> headers ended up in DTS patch, so it cannot be shared with driver tree.
> 
> Ah. I've sent Greg a pull reuqest including that patch, so this is going to get
> worse and the linux-next intermediate builds are going to fail which is never good.
> 
> Best bet at this point may be for Bjorn to also take the dependency 
> you list above and the fix.
> 
> Git will happily unwind the same patch turning up in two trees and
> that way he'll have everything and the IIO tree  + char-misc will
> be fine on their own as well.
> 
> That work for everyone?

Yes, that's also good solution. You only need this one commit:
22f1d06f4f283e36622036726093032a07d67c0d
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221103095810.64606-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof