Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arturas Moskvinas <arturas.moskvinas@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, oskar.andero@gmail.com,
	lars@metafoo.de, lukas@wunner.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arturas.moskvinas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: mcp320x: Simplify device removal logic
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 17:36:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ddfb0ab-10e0-471c-97e1-63018884e4f7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240210155857.59c58dcc@jic23-huawei>



On 2/10/24 17:58, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Use devm_* APIs to enable regulator and to register in IIO infrastructure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arturas Moskvinas <arturas.moskvinas@gmail.com>
> 
> Don't get the same regulator twice so as automate turning it off.
> The devm_regulator_get_enable() call is carefully hiding the
> regulator for cases where the driver never accesses it.
> 
> Here we need it to read the voltage.
> 
> To convert such a case to fully devm managed, use a
> devm_add_action_or_reset() and a custom callback.
This is exactly the reason I wanted to use devm_regulator_get_enable() 
instead of devm_add_action_or_reset + custom callback which I saw in 
other ADCs code. It seems quite repetitive. Wondering if this could be 
addressed by regulator subsystem to provide device managed method which 
gets _enabled_ regulator resource and an automated disabling + resource 
freeing? We will loose fine grained information where failure happened 
exactly - getting resource or enabling regulator though...

>>   static void mcp320x_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>   {
>> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>> -	struct mcp320x *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> -
>> -	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>> -	regulator_disable(adc->reg);
>>   }
> Had the change otherwise been ok...
> 
> You should be able to remove this function completely now it is empty.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/spi/spi.c#L446
> checks it's existence before calling it.
Ack, will address with V2 patch.

Arturas Moskvinas

      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-11 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08  9:43 [PATCH] iio: adc: mcp320x: Simplify device removal logic Arturas Moskvinas
2024-02-10 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-11 15:36   ` Arturas Moskvinas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ddfb0ab-10e0-471c-97e1-63018884e4f7@gmail.com \
    --to=arturas.moskvinas@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=oskar.andero@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox