From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: [PATCH] iio:event: Fix and cleanup locking
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:49:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392403786-22127-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> (raw)
The event code currently holds a spinlock with IRQs disabled while calling
kfifo_to_user(). kfifo_to_user() can generate a page fault though, which means
we have to be able to sleep, which is not possible if the interrupts are
disabled. The good thing is that kfifo handles concurrent read and write access
just fine as long as there is only one reader and one writer, so we do not any
locking to protect against concurrent access from the read and writer thread. It
is possible though that userspace is trying to read from the event FIFO from
multiple concurrent threads, so we need to add locking to protect against this.
This is done using a mutex. The mutex will only protect the kfifo_to_user()
call, it will not protect the waitqueue. This means that multiple threads can be
waiting for new data and once a new event is added to the FIFO all waiting
threads will be woken up. If one of those threads is unable to read any data
(because another thread already read all the data) it will go back to sleep. The
only remaining issue is that now that the clearing of the BUSY flag and the
emptying of the FIFO does no longer happen in one atomic step it is possible
that a event is added to the FIFO after it has been emptied and this sample will
be visible the next time a new event file descriptor is created. To avoid this
rather move the emptying of the FIFO from iio_event_chrdev_release to
iio_event_getfd().
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
---
drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c
index c9c1419..0719443 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct iio_event_interface {
struct list_head dev_attr_list;
unsigned long flags;
struct attribute_group group;
+ struct mutex read_lock;
};
/**
@@ -47,16 +48,17 @@ struct iio_event_interface {
* @indio_dev: IIO device structure
* @ev_code: What event
* @timestamp: When the event occurred
+ *
+ * Note: The caller must make sure that this function is not running
+ * concurrently for the same indio_dev more than once.
**/
int iio_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u64 ev_code, s64 timestamp)
{
struct iio_event_interface *ev_int = indio_dev->event_interface;
struct iio_event_data ev;
- unsigned long flags;
int copied;
/* Does anyone care? */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ev_int->wait.lock, flags);
if (test_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
ev.id = ev_code;
@@ -64,9 +66,8 @@ int iio_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u64 ev_code, s64 timestamp)
copied = kfifo_put(&ev_int->det_events, ev);
if (copied != 0)
- wake_up_locked_poll(&ev_int->wait, POLLIN);
+ wake_up_poll(&ev_int->wait, POLLIN);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ev_int->wait.lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -87,10 +88,8 @@ static unsigned int iio_event_poll(struct file *filep,
poll_wait(filep, &ev_int->wait, wait);
- spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
if (!kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events))
events = POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
return events;
}
@@ -111,31 +110,40 @@ static ssize_t iio_event_chrdev_read(struct file *filep,
if (count < sizeof(struct iio_event_data))
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
- if (kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events)) {
- if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- goto error_unlock;
- }
- /* Blocking on device; waiting for something to be there */
- ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(ev_int->wait,
+ do {
+ if (kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events)) {
+ if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible(ev_int->wait,
!kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events) ||
indio_dev->info == NULL);
- if (ret)
- goto error_unlock;
- if (indio_dev->info == NULL) {
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto error_unlock;
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ if (indio_dev->info == NULL)
+ return -ENODEV;
}
- /* Single access device so no one else can get the data */
- }
- ret = kfifo_to_user(&ev_int->det_events, buf, count, &copied);
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ev_int->read_lock))
+ return -ERESTARTSYS;
+ ret = kfifo_to_user(&ev_int->det_events, buf, count, &copied);
+ mutex_unlock(&ev_int->read_lock);
+
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * If we couldn't read anything from the fifo (a different
+ * thread might have been faster) we either return -EAGAIN if
+ * the file descriptor is non-blocking, otherwise we go back to
+ * sleep and wait for more data to arrive.
+ */
+ if (copied == 0 && (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
+ return -EAGAIN;
-error_unlock:
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
+ } while (copied == 0);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return copied;
}
static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
@@ -143,15 +151,7 @@ static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = filep->private_data;
struct iio_event_interface *ev_int = indio_dev->event_interface;
- spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
- __clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
- /*
- * In order to maintain a clean state for reopening,
- * clear out any awaiting events. The mask will prevent
- * any new __iio_push_event calls running.
- */
- kfifo_reset_out(&ev_int->det_events);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
+ clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
iio_device_put(indio_dev);
@@ -174,22 +174,20 @@ int iio_event_getfd(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
if (ev_int == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
- if (__test_and_set_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
+ if (test_and_set_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags))
return -EBUSY;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
+
iio_device_get(indio_dev);
fd = anon_inode_getfd("iio:event", &iio_event_chrdev_fileops,
indio_dev, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
if (fd < 0) {
- spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
- __clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
+ clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
iio_device_put(indio_dev);
+ } else {
+ kfifo_reset_out(&ev_int->det_events);
}
+
return fd;
}
@@ -425,6 +423,7 @@ static void iio_setup_ev_int(struct iio_event_interface *ev_int)
{
INIT_KFIFO(ev_int->det_events);
init_waitqueue_head(&ev_int->wait);
+ mutex_init(&ev_int->read_lock);
}
static const char *iio_event_group_name = "events";
--
1.8.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 18:49 Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-02-18 10:54 ` [PATCH] iio:event: Fix and cleanup locking Jonathan Cameron
2014-02-18 11:37 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392403786-22127-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).