From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay0097.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.97]:48834 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753311AbbKGSCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:02:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1446919324.2701.1.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: Fix some character line limit coding style issues From: Joe Perches To: Dan Carpenter , Evan Hosseini Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:02:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20151107163005.GI18797@mwanda> References: <20151107150610.GA3250@archBox.attlocal.net> <20151107163005.GI18797@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The original is easier to read, sorry. Checkpatch is a tool not the > king of the world to obeyed at all times. Completely agree. Perhaps there could be some comment indicators added to tell checkpatch to ignore certain warnings like 80 columns.