Re: [PATCH v6] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC108S102 and ADC128S102

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On 21/05/17 15:06, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 21/05/17 13:44, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-05-21 14:18, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 21/05/17 13:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/17 12:59, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-05-21 12:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>>>> On 17/05/17 16:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>> This is an upstream port of an IIO driver for the TI ADC108S102 and
>>>>>>> ADC128S102. The former can be found on the Intel Galileo Gen2 and the
>>>>>>> Siemens SIMATIC IOT2000. For those boards, ACPI-based enumeration is
>>>>>>> included.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Due to the lack of regulators under ACPI, we hard-code the voltage
>>>>>>> provided to the VA pin of the ADC to 5 V, the value used on Galileo
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> IOT2000. For DT usage, the regulator "vref-supply" provides this
>>>>>>> information. Note that DT usage has not been tested.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Original author: Bogdan Pricop <bogdan.pricop@emutex.com>
>>>>>>> Ported from Intel Galileo Gen2 BSP to Intel Yocto kernel:
>>>>>>> Todor Minchev <todor@minchev.co.uk>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>>>> Still an issue wrt to it being obviously correct in the ordering in
>>>>>> probe
>>>>>> and remove.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a reviewer I want to be able to run through each step in probe and
>>>>>> compare with remove to ensure they occur in the opposite order and
>>>>>> reverse all the steps in probe.  Where ever it deviates from that I
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> to think about it and we all know the last thing a reviewer with a big
>>>>>> backlog of patches wants to do is to think hard ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyhow, I've fixed up and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and
>>>>>> pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please check I haven't made a mess of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot to push? Not finding it in togreg, which is 5 days old.
>>>>>
>>>> As it says, pushed out as testing...  Togreg is non rebasing so only
>>>> gets pushed out publicly once all the trivial stuff the autobuilders
>>>> find has been sorted.
>>>>
>>>> Depending on how busy I am it can be a few days before I get a chance
>>>> to push out togreg, whereas testing goes every few patches when I'm
>>>> merging stuff.
>>> Mind you I hadn't pushed that for half an hour or so hence that might
>>> have been out of date too ;)
>>
>> OK, now I see what went wrong: Please have a second look at commit
>> 52d4de2441af... ;)
>>
>> Jan
>>
> Gah!  Thanks.  I knew I did that initially but thought I'd unwound the mess.
> Seems not - here goes again for trying not to be an idiot.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this mess out.
Should now all be fixed up.   I pulled the messed up patch to the tip and
split it up into the original two patches.  'looks' right now I think but
if you wouldn't mind having a quick look that would be great.

Jonathan
> J
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html