From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1518274783.6579.2.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: Software evolution around =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Ccheckpatch=2Epl=E2=80=9D=3F?= From: Joe Perches To: Jonathan Cameron , SF Markus Elfring Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Jiri Kosina , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:59:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20180210145336.233c721d@archlinux> References: <0406765c-bdd1-1a82-cf66-1c248063ae4f@users.sourceforge.net> <20180204112346.0977e938@archlinux> <9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net> <87DF341A-1356-4B1B-8D25-14D5B0AAB01D@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> <20180210145336.233c721d@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 14:53 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > While it would be great to improve checkpatches false > positive rate, it's very nature as a string matcher makes > this hard. true. what are the false positives you see?