From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Set IRQ pin to direction-input if necessary
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:51:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519674701.10722.198.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108170357.GN18997@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:03 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +Cc: Mika
> >
> > On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 03:20 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:03:38 +0200
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > With the new more strict ACPI gpio code the DSDT's IoRestriction
> > > > flags
> > > > are honored on gpiod_get(), but in some DSDT's it is wrong, so
> > > > explicitly call gpiod_direction_input() on the IRQ GPIO if
> > > > necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.co
> > > > m>
> > >
> > > Again, I really really don't like filling driver code with fixes
> > > for broken firmware. I appreciate we have to cope with this, but
> > > it does rather seem like this should be moved into the core code
> > > for say gpiod_get_irq.
> >
> > I would love to fix in general, though it looks not so trivial:
> >
> > - gpiod_get() doesn't know if GPIO is going to be used as IRQ
> > - gpiod_to_irq() doesn't know if descriptor in question comes from
> > GpioIo() ACPI resource
>
> One idea is to allow this strict mode to be relaxed by drivers perhaps
> by passing quirks through struct acpi_gpio_mapping:
>
> static const struct acpi_gpio_mapping acpi_foo_gpios[] = {
> /*
> * This platform has a bug in ACPI GPIO description making IRQ
> * GPIO to be output only. Ask the GPIO core to ignore this
> * limit.
> */
> { "foobar-gpios", &foobar_gpios, 1,
> ACPI_QUIRK_IGNORE_IO_RESTRICTION },
> {},
> };
>
> or something like that. Not sure if I missed something obvious,
> though.
Patch is sent, though I forgot to add you to Cc list.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 13:03 [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Assign interrupt from GpioIo() Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Add GPIO ACPI mapping table Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04 3:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-19 15:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-25 14:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-27 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-01 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2017-12-01 12:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Set IRQ pin to direction-input if necessary Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04 3:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-08 16:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-08 17:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-08 20:45 ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-08 20:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-10 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 19:51 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Add another ACPI ID Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-19 15:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: " Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Assign interrupt from GpioIo() Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-04 10:43 ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-06 9:35 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-19 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-20 10:30 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-25 14:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519674701.10722.198.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).