linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Set IRQ pin to direction-input if necessary
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519674701.10722.198.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108170357.GN18997@lahna.fi.intel.com>

On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:03 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +Cc: Mika
> > 
> > On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 03:20 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:03:38 +0200
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > With the new more strict ACPI gpio code the DSDT's IoRestriction
> > > > flags
> > > > are honored on gpiod_get(), but in some DSDT's it is wrong, so
> > > > explicitly call gpiod_direction_input() on the IRQ GPIO if
> > > > necessary.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.co
> > > > m>
> > > 
> > > Again, I really really don't like filling driver code with fixes
> > > for broken firmware.  I appreciate we have to cope with this, but
> > > it does rather seem like this should be moved into the core code
> > > for say gpiod_get_irq.
> > 
> > I would love to fix in general, though it looks not so trivial:
> > 
> > - gpiod_get() doesn't know if GPIO is going to be used as IRQ
> > - gpiod_to_irq() doesn't know if descriptor in question comes from
> > GpioIo() ACPI resource
> 
> One idea is to allow this strict mode to be relaxed by drivers perhaps
> by passing quirks through struct acpi_gpio_mapping:
> 
> static const struct acpi_gpio_mapping acpi_foo_gpios[] = {
> 	/*
> 	 * This platform has a bug in ACPI GPIO description making IRQ
> 	 * GPIO to be output only. Ask the GPIO core to ignore this
> 	 * limit.
> 	 */
> 	{ "foobar-gpios", &foobar_gpios, 1,
> ACPI_QUIRK_IGNORE_IO_RESTRICTION },
> 	{},
> };
> 
> or something like that. Not sure if I missed something obvious,
> though.

Patch is sent, though I forgot to add you to Cc list.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 13:03 [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Assign interrupt from GpioIo() Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Add GPIO ACPI mapping table Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04  3:14   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-19 15:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-25 14:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-27 15:08         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-01 10:04           ` Linus Walleij
2017-12-01 12:36             ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Set IRQ pin to direction-input if necessary Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04  3:20   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-08 16:35     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-08 17:03       ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-08 20:45         ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-08 20:52           ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-10 18:13           ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 19:51         ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Add another ACPI ID Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-19 15:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-03 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: " Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-04  3:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: proximity: sx9500: Assign interrupt from GpioIo() Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-04 10:43   ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-06  9:35   ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-19 15:24     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-20 10:30       ` Mika Westerberg
2017-11-25 14:28         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519674701.10722.198.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).